v

ENGLISH £MEN OF LETTERS EDITED Br JOHN MORLEY

FIELDING

ENGLISH £MEN OF

FIELDING

AUSTIN DOBSON

LONDON : MACMILLAN fcf CO., LIMITED NINETEEN HUNDRED AND SEVEN

Fo/-/

First published 1883. Re-istve Afitil 1907 Rtfrinted May 1907

PREFATORY NOTE.

FKOM a critical point of view, the works of Fielding have received abundant examination at the hands of a long line of distinguished writers. Of these, the latest is by no means the least ; and as Mr. Leslie Stephen's brilliant studies, in the recent edition de luxe and the Cornhill Magazine, are now in every one's hands, it is perhaps no more than a wise discretion which has prompted me to confine my attention more strictly to the purely biographical side of the subject. In the present memoir, therefore, I have made it my duty, primarily, to verify such scattered anecdotes respecting Fielding as have come down to us ; to correct (I hope not obtrusively) a few mis-statements which have crept into previous accounts ; and to add such supplementary details as I have been able to discover for myself.

In this task I have made use of the following autho- rities : —

I. Arthur Murphy's Essay on the Life and Genitts of Henry Fielding, Esq. This was prefixed to the first collected edition of Fielding's works published by Andrew Millar in April 1762; and it continued for a long time to be the recognised authority for Fielding's life. It is possible that it fairly reproduces his person- ality, as presented by contemporary tradition ; but it is misleading in its facts, and needlessly diffuse. Under

ri PREFATORY NOTK

pretence of respecting "the Manes of the dead," the writer seems to have found it pleasanter to fill his space with vagrant discussions on the "Middle Comedy of the Greeks " and the machinery of the Rape of the Lock, than to make the requisite biographical inquiries. This is the more to be deplored, because, in 1762, Fielding's widow, brother, and sister, as well as his friend Lyttelton, were still alive, and trustworthy information should have been procurable.

II. Watson's Life of Henry Fielding, Esq. This is usually to be found prefixed to a selection of Fielding's works issued at Edinburgh. It also appeared as a volume in 1807, although there is no copy of it in this form at the British Museum. It carries Murphy a little farther, and corrects him in some instances. But its author had clearly never even seen the Miscellanies of 1743, with their valuable Preface, for he speaks of them as one volume, and in apparent ignorance of their contents.

III. Sir Walter Scott's biographical sketch for Ballantyne's Novelists Library. This was published in 1821 ; and is now included in the writer's Miscellaneous Prose Works. Sir Walter made no pretence to original research, and even spoke slightingly of this particular work ; but it has all the charm of his practised and genial pen.

IV. Roscoe's Memoir, compiled for the one-volume edition of Fielding, published by Washbourne and others in 1840.

V. Thackeray's well-known lecture, in the English Humourists of the Eighteenth Century, 1853.

VI. The Life of Henry Fielding ; with Notices of his Writings, his Times, and his Contemporaries. By Frederick Lawrence. 1855. This is an exceedingly painstaking book ; and constitutes the first serious attempt at a biography. Its chief defect — as pointed out at the time of its appearance — is an ill-judged emulation of

PREFATORY NOTE. vii

Forster's Goldsmith. The author attempted to make Fielding a literary centre, which is impossible ; and the attempt has involved him in needless digressions. He is also not always careful to give chapter and verse for his statements.

VII. Thomas Keightley's papers On the Life and Writings of Henry Fielding in Eraser's Magazine for January and February 1858. These, prompted by Mr. Lawrence's book, are most valuable, if only for the author's frank distrust of his predecessors. They are the work of an enthusiast, and a very conscientious examiner. If, as reported, Mr. Keightley himself medi- tated a life of Fielding, it is much to be regretted that he never carried out his intention.

Upon the two last-mentioned works I have chiefly relied in the preparation of this study. I have freely availed myself of the material that both authors col- lected, verifying it always, and extending it wherever I could. Of my other sources of information — pamphlets, reviews, memoirs, and newspapers of the day — the list would be too long ; and sufficient references to them are generally given in the body of the text. I will only add that I think there is scarcely a quotation of import- ance in these pages which has not been compared with the original ; and, except where otherwise stated, all extracts from Fielding himself are taken from the first editions.

At this distance of time, new facts respecting a man of whom so little has been recorded require to be announced with considerable caution. Some definite additions to Fielding lore I have, however, been enabled to make. Thanks to the late Colonel J. L. Chester, who was engaged, only a few weeks before his death, in friendly investigations on my behalf, I am able to give, for the first time, the date and place of Fielding's second marriage, and the baptismal dates of all the children by that marriage, except the eldest. I

riii PREFATORY NOTE.

am also able to fix approximately the true period of hia love-affair with Miss Sarah Andrew. From the original assignment at South Kensington I have ascertained the exact sum paid by Millar for Joseph Andrews ; and in chapter v. will be found a series of extracts from a very interesting correspondence, which does not appear to have been hitherto published, between Aaron Hill, his daughters, and Richardson, respecting Tom Jones. Although I cannot claim credit for the discovery, I believe the present is also the first biography of Fielding which entirely discredits the unlikely story of his having been a stroller at Bartholomew Fair ; and I may also, I think, claim to have thrown some additional light on Fielding's relations with the Gibbers, seeing that the last critical essay upon the author of the Apology which I have met with, contains no reference to Fielding at all. For such minor novelties as the passage from the Universal Spectator at p. 26, and the account of the projected translation of Lucian at p. 163, etc., the reader is referred to the book itself, where these, and other waifs and strays, are duly indicated. If, in my endeavour to secure what is freshest, I have at the same time neglected a few stereotyped quotations, which have hitherto seemed indispensable in writing of Fielding, I trust I may be forgiven.

Brief as it is, the book has not been without its obligations. To Mr. R F. Sketchley, Keeper of the Dyce and Forster Collections at South Kensington, I am indebted for reference to the Hill correspondence, and for other kindly offices ; to Mr. Frederick Locker for permission to collate Fielding's last letter with the original in his possession. My thanks are also due to Mr. R Arthur Kinglake, J.P., of Taunton ; to the Rev. Edward Hale of Eton College, the Rev. G. C. Green of Modbury, Devon, the Rev. W. S. Shaw of Twerton- on-Avon, and Mr. Richard Garnett of the British Museum. Without some expression of gratitude to the

PREFATORY NOTE. Ix

last mentioned, it would indeed be almost impossible to conclude any modern preface of this kind. If I have omitted the names of others who have been good enough to assist me, I must ask them to accept my acknowledg- ments although they are not specifically expressed.

BALING, March 1883.

I have taken advantage of the present issue to add, in the form of Appendices, some supplementary partic- ulars which have come to my knowledge since the book was first published. The most material of these is the curious confirmation and extension of Fielding's love affair with Sarah Andrew. Besides these additions, a few necessary rectifications have been made in the text.

A. D.

BALING, April 1889.

The approaching bi-centenary (April 22, 1907) of Fielding's birth affords a pretext for bringing together, in a fourth Appendix, some additional particulars which have been discovered or established since the issue of the last edition of this Memoir. These particulars relate to his pedigree, his residence at Leyden as a student, his marriage to his first wife Charlotte Cradock, his Will, his library, his family and some other minor matters.

A. D.

EALING, March 1907.

CONTENTS.

CHAPTER I.

PAGE

EARLY YEARS— FIRST PLAYS .... 1

CHAPTER II. MORE PLAYS — MARRIAGE — THE LICENSING ACT ... 28

CHAPTER III. THE CHAMPION— JOSEPH ANDREWS 60

CHAPTER IY. THE MISCELLANIES — JONATHAN WILD , 89

CHAPTER V, TOM JONES 117

CHAPTER YI. JtrsTiCE LIFE — AMELIA . 145

CHAPTER VII. THE JOURNAL OF A VOYAGE TO LISBON 168

xii CONTKNTS.

POSTSCRIPT 191

APPENDIX No. I.

Fi HUM M; AND SARAH ANDREW 197

APPENDIX No. II. FIELDING AND MRS. HVSSEY 202

APPENDIX No. III. AM ILIA'S ACCIDENT 205

APPENDIX No. IV.

FlKLDINOIANA 206

INDEX 215

FIELDING.

CHAPTER I.

EARLY YEARS — FIRST PLAYS.

LIKE his contemporary Smollett, Henry Fielding came of an ancient family, and might, in his Horatian moods, have traced his origin to Inachus. The lineage of the house of Denbigh, as given in Burke, fully justifies the splendid but sufficiently quoted eulogy of Gibbon. From that first Jeffrey of Hapsburgh, who came to England, temp. Henry III., and assumed the name of Fieldeng, or Filding, " from his father's pretensions to the dominions of Laufienbourg and Rinfilding," the future novelist could boast a long line of illustrious ancestors. There was a Sir William Feilding killed at Tewkesbury, and a Sir Everard who commanded at Stoke. Another Sir William, a staunch Royalist, was created Earl of Denbigh, and died in fighting King Charles's battles. Of his two sons, the elder, Basil, who succeeded to the title, was a Parliament- arian, and served at Edgehill under Essex. George, his second son, was raised to the peerage of Ireland as Vis- count Callan, with succession to the earldom of Desmond ; and from this, the younger branch of the Denbigh family, Henry Fielding directly descended. The Earl of Des-

2 FIELDING. [CHAP.

mond's fifth son, John, entered the Church, becoming Canon of Salisbury and Chaplain to William III. By his wife Bridget, daughter of Scipio C'ockain, Esq., of Somer- set, he had three sons and three daughters. Edmund, the third son, was a soldier, who fought with distinction under Marlborough. When about the age of thirty, he mar- lied Sarah, daughter of Sir Henry Gould, Knt., of Sharp- ham Park, near Glastonbury, in Somerset, and one of the Judges of the King's Bench. These last were the parents of the novelist, who was born at Sharpham Park on the 22d of April 1707. One of Dr. John Fielding's nieces, it may here be added, married the first Duke of Kingston, becoming the mother of Lady Mary Pierrepont, after- wards Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, who was thus Henry Fielding's second cousin. She had, however, been born in 1689, and was consequently some years his senior.

According to a pedigree given in Nichols (History and Antiquities of Hie County of Leicester), Edmund Fielding was only a lieutenant when he married ; and it is even not improbable (as Mr. Keightley conjectures from the nearly secret union of Lieutenant Booth and Amelia in the later noveD that the match may have been a stolen one. At all events, the bride continued to reside at her father's house ; and the fact that Sir Henry Gould, by his will made in March 1706, left his daughter £3000, which was to be invested "in the purchase either of a Church or Colledge lease, or of lands of Inheritance," for her sole use, her husband having "nothing to doe with it," would seem (as Mr. Keightley suggests) to indi- cate a distrust of his military, and possibly impecunious, son-in-law. This money, it is also important to re- member, was to come to her children at her death. Sir

I.] EARLY YEARS. 8

Henry Gould did not long survive the making of his will, and died in March 1710.1 The Fieldings must then have removed to a small house at East Stour (now Stower), in Dorsetshire, where Sarah Fielding was born in the follow- ing November. It may be that this property was purchased with Mrs. Fielding's money ; but information is wanting upon the subject At East Stour, according to the ex- tracts from the parish register given in Hutchins's His- tory of Dorset, four children were born, — namely, Sarah, above mentioned, afterwards the authoress of Da-rid Simple, Anne, Beatrice, and another son, Edmund. Edmund, says Arthur Murphy, "was an officer in the marine service," and (adds Mr. Lawrence) "died young." Anne died at East Stour in August 1716. Of Beatrice nothing further is known. These would appear to have been all the children of Edmund Fielding by his first wife, although, as Sarah Fielding is styled on her monu- ment at Bath the second daughter of General Fielding, it is not impossible that another daughter may have been bom at Sharpham Park.

At East Stour the Fieldings certainly resided until April 1718, when Mrs. Fielding died, leaving her elder son a boy of not quite eleven years of age. How much longer the family remained there is unrecorded ; but it is clear that a great part of Henry Fielding's childhood must have been spent by the "pleasant Banks of sweetly-winding Stour " which passes through it, and to which he subsequently refers in Tom Jones. His educa-

1 Mr. Keightley, who seems to have seen the will, dates it — doubtless by a slip of the pen — May 1708. Reference to the ori- ginal, however, now at Somerset House, shows the correct date to be March 8, 1706, before which time the marriage of Fielding's parents must therefore be placed.

4 FIELDING. [CHAP.

tion during this time was confided to a certain Mr Oliver, whom Lawrence designates the " family chaplain." Keightley supposes that he was the curate of East Stour ; but Hutchins, a better authority than either, says that he was the clergyman of Motcombe, a neighbour- ing village. Of this gentleman, according to Murphy, Parson Trulliber in Joseph Andreics is a "very humorous and striking portrait." It is certainly more humorous than complimentary.

From Mr. Oliver's fostering care — and the result shows that, whatever may have been the pig-dealing propen- sities of Parson Trulliber, it was not entirely profitless — Fielding was transferred to Eton. When this took place is not known ; but at that time boys entered the school much earlier than they do now, and it was probably not long after his mother's death. The Eton boys were then, as at present, divided into collegers and oppidans. There are no registers of oppidans before the end of the last century ; but the Provost of Eton has been good enough to search the college lists from 1715 to 1735, and there is no record of any Henry Fielding, nor indeed of any Fielding at all. It may therefore be concluded that he was an oppidan. No particulars of his stay at Eton have come down to us ; but it is to be presumed Murphy's statement that, " when he left the place, he was said to be uncommonly versed in the Greek authors, and an early master of the Latin classics," is not made without foundation.1 We have also his own authority (in Tom

1 Fielding's own words in the versea to Walpole some years later scarcely go so far :—

" Tuscan and French are in my Head ; Latin I write, and Greek I read."

i.] EARLY YEARS. 5

Jones) for supposing that he occasionally, if not frequently, sacrificed " with true Spartan devotion " at the " birchen Altar," of which a representation is to be found in Mr. Maxwell Lyte's history of the College. And it may fairly be inferred that he took part in the different sports and pastimes of the day, such as Conquering Lobs, Steal baggage, Chuck, Starecaps, and so forth. Nor does it need any strong effort of imagination to conclude that he bathed in " Sandy hole " or "Cuckow ware," attended the cock-fights in Bedford's Yard and the bull-baiting in Bachelor's Acre, drank mild punch at the "Christopher," and, no doubt, was occasionally brought back by Jack Cutler, " Pursuivant of Eunaways," to make his explana- tions to Dr. Bland the Head-Master, or Francis Goode the Usher. Among his school-fellows were some who subsequently attained to high dignities in the State, and still remained his friends. Foremost of these was George Lyttelton, later the statesman and orator, who had al- ready commenced poet as an Eton boy with his "Soliloquy of a Beauty in the Country." Another was the future Sir Charles Hanbury Williams, the wit and squib-writer, then known as Charles Hanbury only. A third was Thomas Winnington, for whom, in after years, Fielding fought hard with brain and pen when Tory scribblers assailed his memory. Of those who must be regarded as contemporaries merely, were William Pitt, the " Great Commoner," and yet greater Earl of Chatham; Henry Fox, Lord Holland; and Charles Pratt, Earl Camden. Gilbert West, the translator of Pindar, may also have been at Eton in Fielding's time, as he was only a year older, and was intimate with Lyttelton. Thomas Augus- tine Arne, again, famous in days to come as Dr. Arne, was

FIELDINi:. [CHAP.

doubtless also at this date practising sedulously upon that " miserable cracked common flute," with which tradition avers he was wont to torment his school-fellows. Gray and Horace Walpole belong to a later period.

During his stay at Eton, Fielding had been rapidly developing from a boy into a young man. When he left school it is impossible to say; but he was probably seven- teen or eighteen years of age, and it is at this stage of his career that must be fixed an occurrence which one of his biographers places much farther on. This is bis earliest recorded love-affair. At Lyme Regis there re- sided a young lady, who, in addition to great personal charms, had the advantage of being the only daughter and heiress of one Solomon Andrew, deceased, a mer- chant of considerable local reputation. Lawrence says that she was Fielding's cousin. This may be so; but the statement is unsupported by any authority. It is certain, however, that her father was dead, and that she was living " in maiden meditation " at Lyme with one of her guardians, Mr. Andrew Tucker. In his chance visits to that place, young Fielding appears to have become desperately enamoured of her, and to have sadly flut- tered the Dorset dovecotes by his pertinacious and un- desirable attentions. At one time he seems to have actually meditated the abduction of his " flame," for an entry in the town archives, discovered by Mr. George Roberts, sometime Mayor of Lyme, who tells the story, declares that Andrew Tucker, Esq., went in fear of his life " owing to the behaviour of Henry Fielding and his attendant, or man." Such a state of things (especially when guardians have sons of their own) is clearly not to be endured ; and Miss Andrew was prudently trans-

i.] EARLY YEARS. 7

ferred to the care of another guardian, Mr. Khodes of Modbury, in South Devon, to whose son, a young gen- tleman of Oxford, she was promptly married. Burke (Landed Gentry, 1858) dates the marriage in 1726, a date which is practically confirmed by the baptism of a child at Modbury in April of the following year. Burke further describes the husband as Mr. Ambrose Rhodes of Buckland House, Buckland-Tout-Saints. His son, Mr. Rhodes of Bellair, near Exeter, was gentleman of the Privy Chamber to George III. ; and one of his descend- ants possessed a picture which passed for the portrait of Sophia Western. The tradition of the Tucker family pointed to Miss Andrew as the original of Fielding's heroine ; but though such a supposition is intelligible, it is untenable, since he says distinctly (Book XIII. chap. i. of Tom Jones) that his model was his first wife, whose likeness he moreover draws very specifically in another place, by declaring that she resembled Margaret Cecil, Lady Ranelagh, and, more nearly, " the famous Dutchess of Mazarine."1

With this early escapade is perhaps to be connected what seems to have been one of Fielding's earliest literary efforts. This is a modernisation in burlesque octosyllabic verse of part of Juvenal's sixth satire. In the " Preface " to the later published Miscellanies, it is said to have been " originally sketched out before he was Twenty," and to have constituted " all the Revenge taken by an injured Lover. " But it must have been largely revised subsequent to that date, for it contains references to Mrs. Clive, Mrs. Woffington, Gibber the younger, and even to Richardson's Pamela. It has no special merit, although some of the i See Appendix No. I. : Fielding and Sarah Andrew.

8 FIKL1HX<;. [CHAP.

couplets have the true Swiftian turn. If Murphy's state- ment be correct, that the author " went from Eton to Leyden," it must have been planned at the latter place, where, he tells us in the preface to Don Quixote in Emj- land, he also began that comedy. Notwithstanding these literary distractions, he is nevertheless reported to have studied the civilians " with a remarkable application for about two years." At the expiration of this time, remit- tances from homo failing, he was obliged to forego the lectures of the " learned Vitriarius " (then Professor of Civil Law at Leyden University), and return to London, which he did at the beginning of 1728 or the end of 1727.

The fact was that his father, never a rich man, had married again. His second wife was a widow named Eleanor Rasa ; and by this time he was fast ac- quiring a second family. Under the pressure of his growing cares, he found himself, however willing, as unable to maintain his eldest son in London as he had previously been to discharge his expenses at Leyden. Nominally, he made him an allowance of two hundred a year; but this, as Fielding himself explained, "any body might pay that would." The consequence was, that not long after the arrival of the latter in the Metropolis he had given up all idea of pursuing the law, to which his mother's legal connections had perhaps first attracted him, and had determined to adopt the more seductive occupation of living by his wits. At this date he was in the prime of youth. From the portrait by Hogarth representing him at a time when he was broken in health and had lost his teeth, it is difficult to reconstruct his likeness at twenty. But we may fairly assume the " high-

i.] EARLY YEARS. 9

arched Roman nose " with which his enemies reproached him, the dark eyes, the prominent chin, and the humorous expression ; and it is clear that he must have been tall and vigorous, for he was over six feet when he died, and had been remarkably strong and active. Add to this that he inherited a splendid constitution, with an un- limited capacity for enjoyment, and we have a fair idea of Henry Fielding at that moment of his career, when with passions " tremblingly alive all o'er " — as Murphy says — he stood,

"This way and that dividing the swift mind,"

between the professions of hackney-writer and hackney- coachman. His natural bias was towards literature, and his opportunities, if not his inclinations, directed him to dramatic writing.

It is not necessary to attempt any detailed account of the state of the stage at this epoch. Nevertheless, if only to avoid confusion in the future, it will be well to enumerate the several London theatres in 17 2 8, the more especially as the list is by no means lengthy!" First and foremost there was the old Opera House in the Haymarket, built by Vanbragh, as far back as 1705, upon the site now occupied by Her Majesty's Theatre. This was the home of that popular Italian song which so excited the anger of thorough-going Britons ; and here, at the beginning of 1728, they were performing Handel's opera of Siroe, and delighting the cognoscenti by Dite die f&, the echo-air in the same composer's Tolomeo. Oppo- site the Opera House, and, in position, only " a few feet distant" from the existing Haymarket Theatre, was the New, or Little Theatre in the Haymarket, which, from

10 F1KI,DIN«:. IC-HAI-.

the fact that it had been opened eight years before by "the French Comedians," was also sometimes styled the French House. Next comes the no-longer-existent theatre in Lincoln's Inn Fields, which Christopher Rich had rebuilt in 1714, and which his son John had made notorious for pantomimes. Here the Beggar's Opera, precursor of a long line of similar productions, had just been successfully produced. Finally, most ancient of them all, there was the Theatre-Royal in Drury Lane, otherwise the King's Play House, or Old House. The virtual patentees at this time were the actors Colley Gibber, Robert Wilks, and Barton Booth. The two for- mer were just playing the Provok'd Husband, in which the famous Mrs. Oldfield (Pope's "Narcissa") had created & furore by her assumption of Lady Townley. These, in February 1728, were the four principal London theatres. Goodman's Fields, where Garrick made his debut, was not opened until the following year, and Covent Garden belongs to a still later date.

Fielding's first dramatic essay — or, to speak more precisely, the first of his dramatic essays that was pro- duced upon the stage — was a five-act comedy entitled Jjove in Several Masques. It was played at Drury Lane in February 1728, succeeding the Prorok'il Hudxuul. In his " Preface " the young author refers to the disadvan- tage under which he laboured in following close upon that comedy, and also in being "cotemporary with an Entertainment which engrosses the whole Talk and Admiration of the Town," — i.e. the Beggar's Opera. He also acknowledges the kindness of Wilks and Gibber " previous to its Representation," and the fact that he had thus acquired their suffrages makes it doubtful

i.] FIRST PLAYS. 11

whether his stay at Leyden was not really briefer than is generally supposed, or that he left Eton much earlier. In either case he must have been in London some months before Love in Several Masques appeared, for a first play by an untried youth of twenty, however promising, is not easily brought upon the boards in any era ; and from his own utterances in Pasquin, ten years later, it is clear that it was no easier then than now. The sentiments of the Fustian of that piece in the following protest probably give an accurate picture of the average dramatic experiences of Henry Fielding : —

" These little things, Mr. Sneerwell, will sometimes hap- pen. Indeed a Poet undergoes a great deal before he conies to his Third Night ; first with the Muses, who are humorous Ladies, and must be attended ; for if they take it into their Head at any time to go abroad and leave you, you will pump your Brain in vain : Then, Sir, with the Master of a Play- house to get it acted, irhom you generally follow a quarter of a Year before you know whether he will receive it or no; and then perhaps he tells you it won't do, and returns it you again, reserving the Subject, and perhaps the Name, which he brings out in his next Pantomime ; but if he should receive the Play, then you must attend again to get it writ out into Parts, and Rehears'd. Well, Sir, at last the Rehearsals begin ; then, Sir, begins another Scene of Trouble with the Actors, some of whom dont like their Parts, and all are continually plaguing you with Alterations : At length, after having waded thro' all these Difficulties, his [the ?] Play appears on the Stage, where one Man Hisses out of Resentment to the Author ; a Second out of Dislike to the House ; a Third out of Dislike to the Actor ; a Fourth out of Dislike to the Play ; a Fifth for the Joke sake ; a Sixth to keep all the rest in Company. Enemies abuse him, Friends give him up, the Play is damn'd, and the Author goes to the Devil, so ends the Farce."

To which Sneerwell replies, with much promptitude :

12

FIELDING.

[CHAP.

" The Tragedy rather, I think, Mr. Fustian" But what- ever may have been its preliminary difficulties, Fielding's first play was not exposed to so untoward a fate. It was well received. As might be expected in a beginner, and as indeed the references in the Preface to Wycherley and Congreve would lead us to expect, it was an obvious attempt in the manner of those then all-popular writers. The dialogue is ready and witty. But the characters have that obvious defect which Lord Beaconsfield recognised when he spoke in later life of his own earliest efforts. " Books written by boys," he says, " which pretend to give a picture of manners and to deal in knowledge of human nature must necessarily be founded on affectation." To this rule the personages of Love in Several Masques are no exception. They are drawn rather from the stage than from life, and there is little constructive skill in the plot. A certain booby squire, Sir Positive Trap, seems like a first indication of some of the later successes in the novels ; but the rest of the dramatis personce are puppets. The success of the piece was probably owing to the acting of Mrs. Oldfielcl, who took the part of Lady Matchless, a character closely related to the Lady Townleys and Lady Betty Modishes, in which she won her triumphs. She seems, indeed, to have been un- usually interested in this comedy, for she consented to play in it notwithstanding a " slight Indisposition " con- tracted " by her violent Fatigue in the Part of Lady Townly," and she assisted the author with her correc- tions and advice — perhaps with her influence as an actress. Fielding's distinguished kinswoman Lady Mary Wortley Montagu also read the MS. Looking to certain scenes in it, the protestation in the Prologue —

I.] FIRST PLAYS. 13

" Nought shall offend the Fair Ones Ears to-day, JFhich tlmj might blush to hear, or blush to say " —

has an air of insincerity, although, contrasted with some of the writer's later productions, Love in Several Masques is comparatively pure. But he might honestly think that the work which had received the imprimatur of a stage-queen and a lady of quality should fairly be re- garded as morally blameless, and it is not necessary to bring any bulk of evidence to prove that the morality of 1728 differed from the morality of to-day.

To the last-mentioned year is ascribed a poem entitled the " Masquerade. Inscribed to C — t H — d — g — r. By Lemuel Gulliver, Poet Laureate to the King of Lilliput." In this Fielding made his satirical contribution to the attacks on those impure gatherings organised by the notorious Heidegger, which Hogarth had not long before stigmatised pictorially in the plate known to collectors as the "large Masquerade Ticket." As verse this performance is worthless, and it is not very forcibly on the side of good manners ; but the ironic dedication has a certain touch of Fielding's later fashion. Two other poetical pieces, afterwards included in the Miscellanies of. 1743, also bear the date of 1728. One is A Description of U — n G — (alias New Hog's Norton) in Com. Hants, which Mr. Keightley has identified with Upton Grey, near Odiham, in Hampshire. It is a burlesque description of a tumble- down country-house in which the writer was staying, and is addressed to Rosalinda. The other is entitled To Euthalia, from which it must be concluded that, in 1728, Sarah Andrew had found more than one successor. But in spite of some biographers, and of the apparent encouragement given to his first comedy, Fielding does

14 FIELDING. [CHAP.

not seem to have followed up dramatic authorship with equal vigour, or at all events with equal success. His real connection with the stage does not begin until January 1730, when the Temple Beau was produced by Giffard the actor at the theatre in Goodman's Fields, which had then just been opened by Thomas Odell ; and it may be presumed that his incentive was rather want of funds than desire of fame. The Temple Beau certainly shows an advance upon its predecessor ; but it is an advance in the same direction, imitation of Congreve ; and although Geneste ranks it amo'ng the best of Fielding's plays, it is doubtful whether modern criticism would sustain his verdict It ran for a short time, and was then with- drawn. The Prologue was the work of James Ralph, afterwards Fielding's colleague in the Champion, and it thus refers to the prevailing taste. The Beggar's Opera had killed Italian song, but now a new danger had arisen, —

" Humour and Wit, in each politer Age, Triumphant, reared the Trophiet of the Stage : But only Farce, and Shew, will note go down, And Harlequin's the Darling of the Town."

As if to confirm his friend's opinion, Fielding's next piece combined the popular ingredients above referred to. In March following he produced at the Haymarket, under the pseudonym of Scriblerus Secundus, The Author's Farce, with a "Puppet Show" called The Pleasures of the Town. In the Puppet Show, Henley, the Clare- Market Orator, and Samuel Johnson, the quack author of the popular Hurlothrumbo, were smartly satirised, as also was the fashionable craze for Opera and Pantomime. But the most enduring part of this odd

i.] FIRST PLAYS. 15

medley is the farce which occupies the two first acts, and under thin disguises no doubt depicts much which was within the writer's experience. At all events, Luckless, the author in the play, has more than one of the characteristics which distinguish the traditional por- trait of Fielding himself in his early years. He wears a laced coat, is in love, writes plays, and cannot pay his landlady, who declares, with some show of justice, that she "would no more depend on a Benefit-Night of an un-acted Play, than she wou'd on a Benefit-Ticket in an un-drawn Lottery." "Her Floor (she laments) is all spoil'd with Ink — her Windows with Verses, and her Door has been almost beat down with Duns." But the most humorous scenes in the play — scenes really admirable in their ironic delineation of the seamy side of authorship in 1730 — are those in which Mr. Bookweight, the pub- lisher— the Curll or Osborne of the period — is shown surrounded by the obedient hacks, who feed at his table on " good Milk-porridge, very often twice a Day," and manufacture the murders, ghost-stories, political pam- phlets, and translations from Virgil (out of Dryden) with which he supplies his customers. Here is one of them as good as any : —

"•Bookweight. So, Mr. Index, what News with you?

Index. I have brought my Bill, Sir.

Book. What's here ? — for fitting the Motto of Risum teneatis Amici to a dozen Pamphlets at Sixpence per each, Six Shillings — For Omnia vincit Amor, & nos cedamus Amori, Sixpence — For Difficile est Satyram non scribere, Sixpence — Hum ! hum ! hum ! Sum total, for Thirty-six Latin Motto's, Eighteen Shillings; ditto English, One Shilling and Nine- pence ; ditto Greek, Four, Four Shillings. These Greek Motto's are excessively dear.

1« FIELDING. [CEAP.

2nd. If you have them cheaper at i-ith.-r <>f tlie Univer- .-itii s, I will give you mine for nothing.

Book. You sliall have your Money immediately, and pray remember that I must have two Latin Seditious Motto's and one Greek Moral Motto for Pamphlets by to-morrow Morning. . . .

Ind. Sir, I shall provide them. Be pleas'd to look on that, Sir, and print me Five hundred Proposals, and as many Receipts.

Book. Proposals for printing by Subscription a new Trans- lation of Cicero, Of the Nature of the God> and hi» Tuncvlan Question*, by Jeremy Index, Esq. ; I am sorry you have un- dertaken this, for it prevents a Design of mine.

Ind. Indeed, Sir, it does not, for you see all of the Book that I ever intend to publish. It is only a handsome Way of asking one's Friends for a Guinea.

Book. Then you have not translated a Word of it, perhaps.

Ind. Not a single Syllable.

Book. Well, you shall have your Proposals forthwith ; but I desire you wou'd be a little more reasonable in your Bills for the future, or I shall deal with you no longer ; for I have a certain Fellow of a College, who offers to furnish me with Second-hand Motto's out of the Spectator for Two-pence each.

Ind. Sir, I only desire to live by my Goods, and I hope you will be pleas'd to allow some difference between a neat fresh Piece, piping hot out of the Classicks, and old thread-bare worn-out Stuff that has past thro' ev'ry Pedant'* Mouth. . . ."

The latter partof this amusing dialogue, referring to Mr. Index's translation from Cicero, was added in an amended version of the Author's Farct, which appeared some years later, and in which Fielding depicts the portrait of an- other all-powerful personage in the literary life, — the actor-manager. This, however, will be more conveniently treated under its proper date, and it is only necessary to say here that the slight sketches of Marplay and

i.] EARLY PLAYS. 17

Sparkish given in the first edition, were presumably in- tended for Gibber and "Wilks, with whom, notwithstand- ing the "civil and kind Behaviour" for which he had thanked them in the " Preface " to Love in Several Masques, the young dramatist was now, it seems, at war. In the introduction to the Miscellanies, he refers to "a slight Pique" with Wilks; and it is not impossible that the key to the difference may be found in the following passage : —

" Sparkish. What dost think of the Play ?

Marplay. It may be a very good one, for ought I know ; but I know the Author has no Interest.

Spark. Give me Interest, and rat the Play.

Mar. Rather rat the Play which has no Interest. Interest sways as much in the Theatre as at Court. — And you know it is not always the Companion of Merit in either."

The handsome student from Leyden — the potential Congreve who wrote Love in Several Masques, and had Lady Mary Wortley Montagu for patroness, might fairly be supposed to have expectations which warranted the civilities of Messrs. Wilks and Gibber; but the "Luck- less " of two years later had probably convinced them that his dramatic performances did not involve their sine qua non of success. Under these circumstances nothing perhaps could be more natural than that they should play their parts in his little satire.

We have dwelt at some length upon the Author's Farce, because it is the first of Fielding's plays in which, leaving the " wit-traps " of Wycherley and Congreve, he deals with the direct censure of contemporary folly, and because, apart from translation and adaptation, it is in this field that his most brilliant theatrical successes were

18 FIELDING. [CHAP.

| won. For the next few years he continued to produce comedies and farces with great rapidity, both under his own name, and under the pseudonym of Scriblerus Se- cundus. Most of these show manifest signs of haste, and some are recklessly immodest. We shall confine our- selves to one or two of the best, and do little more than enumerate the others. Of these latter, the Coffee-House Politician; or, The Justice caught in his own Trap, 1730, succeeded the Author's Farce. The leading idea, that of a tradesman who neglects his shop for " foreign affairs," appears to be derived from Addison's excellent character- sketch in the Taller of the " Political Upholsterer." This is the more likely, in that Arne the musician, whose father is generally supposed to have been Addison's original, was Fielding's contemporary at Eton. Justice Squeezum, another character contained in this play, is a kind of first draft of the later Justice Thrasher in Amelia. The representation of the trading justice on the stage, however, was by no means new, since Justice Quorum in Coffey's Beggar's Wedding (with whom, as will appear presently, Fielding's name has been erroneously associated) exhibits similar characteristics. Omitting for the moment the burlesque of Tom Thumb, the Coffee-House Politician was followed by the Letter Writers ; or, A new Way to Keep a Wife at Home, 1 731, a brisk little farce, with one vigorously drawn character, that of Jack Commons, a young university rake; the Grub-Street Operrt, 17-'U ; the farce of the Lottery, 1731, in which the famous Mrs. C'live, then Miss Raftor, appeared; the Modern Husband, 1732 ; the Covent Garden Tragedy, 1732, a broad and rather riotous burlesque of Ambrose Philips' Di4re$t Mother; and the Debauchees ; or, The Jesuit CaiiyM, 1732 — which

i.] EARLY PLAYS. 19

was based upon the then debated story of Father Girard and Catherine Cadiere.

Neither of the two last-named pieces is worthy of the author, and their strongest condemnation in our day is that they were condemned in their own for their un- bridled license, the Grub Street Journal going so far as to say that they had " met with the universal detestation of the Town." The Modern Husband, which turns on that most loathsome of all commercial pursuits, the traffic of a husband in his wife's dishonour, appears, oddly enough, to have been regarded by its author with espe- cial complacency. Its prologue lays stress upon the moral purpose ; it was dedicated to Sir Eobert Walpole; and from a couple of letters printed in Lady Mary Wort- ley Montagu's Correspondence, it is clear that it had been submitted to her perusal. It had, however, no great success upon the stage, and the chief thing worth re- membering about it is that it afforded his last character to Wilks, who played the part of Bellamant. That " slight Pique," of which mention has been made, was no doubt by this time a thing of the past.

But if most of the works in the foregoing list can hardly be regarded as creditable to Fielding's artistic or moral sense, one of them at least deserves to be excepted, and that is the burlesque of Tom Thumb. This was first brought out in 1730 at the little theatre in the Hay- market, where it met with a favourable reception. In the following year it was enlarged to three acts (in the first version there had been but two), and reproduced at the same theatre as the Tragedy of Tragedies; or, The Life and Death of Tom Thumb the Great, "with the Anno- tations of H. Scriblerus Secundus." It is certainly one

80 FIELDING. [• HU

of the best burlesques ever written. As Baker observes in his Bioyraphia Dramatica, it may fairly be ranked as a sequel to Buckingham's L'ehearsal, since it includes the absurdities of nearly all the writers of tragedies from the period when tliat piece stops to 1730. Among the authors satirised are Nat. Lee, Thomson (whose famous

" 0 Sophonisba, Sophonisba, O !" is parodied by

"O Huncainunca, Huncamunca, 0 !"),

Banks's Earl of Essex, a favourite play at Bartholomew Fair, the Bttsiris of Young, and the Aurengzebe of Dry- den, etc. The annotations, which abound in transparent references to Dr. B[«i/k]y, Mr. T[hwbaT\d, Mr. D{V«?<i]s, are excellent imitations of contemporary pedantry. One example, elicited in Act 1 by a reference to "giants," must stand for many : —

" That learned Historian Mr. S n in the third Num- ber of his Criticism on our Author, takes great Pains to explode this Passage. It is, says he, difficult to guess what Giants are here meant, unless the Giant Despair in the Pil- grim's Progress, or the giant Greatness in the Royal Villain ; for I have heard of no other sort of Giants in the Reign of King Arthur. Petrus Burmanus makes three Tom Thumbs, one whereof he supposes to have been the same Person whom the Greeks called Hercules, and that by these Giants are to be understood the CeMaurs slain by that Heroe. Another Tom Thumb he contends to have been no other than the Her met Tritmegistus of the Antiente. The third Tom Thumb he places under the Reign of King Arthur; to which third Tom Thumb, says he, the Actions of the other two were attributed. Now, tho' I know that this Opinion is supported by an Assertion of Justus Lipsiut, Thomam ilium Thumbum non alium quam

i.1 EARLY PLAYS. 21

llercukm fitisse satis constat; yet shall I venture to oppose one Line of Mr. Midwinter, against them all,

In Arthurs' Court Tom Thumb did live.

" But then, says Dr. B y, if we place Tom Thumb

in the Court of King Arthur, it will be proper to place that Court out of Britain, where no Giants were ever heard of. Spencer, in his Fairy Queen, is of another Opinion, where describing Albion, he says,

Far within, a salvage Nation dwelt Of hideous Giants.

And in the same canto :

Then Elfar, ivith two Brethren Giants had The one of which had two Heads, — Tlw other three. Risum teneatis, Amici."

Of the play itself it is difficult to give an idea by extract, as nearly every line travesties some tragic pass- age once familiar to play -goers, and now utterly for- gotten. But the following lines from one of the speeches of Lord C4rizzle — a part admirably acted by Listen in later years1 — are a fair specimen of its ludicrous use (or rather abuse) of simile : —

" Yet think not long, I will my Rival bear, Or unreveng'd the slighted Willow wear ; The gloomy, brooding Tempest now confm'd, Within the hollow Caverns of my Mind, In dreadful Whirl, shall rowl along the Coasts, Shall thin the Land of all the Men it boasts, \\ And cram up ev'ry Chink of Hell with Ghosts. So have I seen, in some dark Winter's Day, A sudden Storm rush down the Sky's High -Way, Sweep thro' the Streets with terrible ding-dong, Gush thro' the Spouts, and wash whole Crowds along.

1 Compare Hazlitt, On tlic Comic Writers of the Lust Century.

22 FIELDIN'.

The crowded Shops, the thronging Yi-rmin skrecn, Together cram the Dirty and the Clean, And not one Shoe-Boy in the Street is sceu."

In the modern version of Kane O'Hara, to which songs were added, the Tragedy of Tragedies still keeps, or kept the stage. But its crowning glory is its traditional connection with Swift, who told Mrs. Pilkington that he " had not laugh'd above twice " in his life, once at the tricks of a merry-andrew, and again when (in Fielding's burlesque) Tom Thumb killed the ghost. This is an incident of the earlier versions, omitted in deference to the critics, for which the reader will seek vainly in the play as now printed ; and he will, moreover, discover that Mrs. Pilkington's memory served her imperfectly, since it is not Tom Thumb who kills the ghost, but the ghost of Tom Thumb which is killed by his jealous rival, Lord Grizzle. A trifling inaccuracy of this sort, how- ever, is rather in favour of the truth of the story than against it, for a pure fiction would in all probability have been more precise. Another point of interest in connec- tion with this burlesque is the frontispiece which Hogarth supplied to the edition of 1731. It has no special value as a design, but it constitutes the earliest reference to that friendship with the painter, of which so many traces arc to be found in Fielding's works.

Hitherto Fielding had succeeded best in burlesque. But, in 1732, the same year in which he produced the Modern Husband, the Debauchees, and the Co-rent Garden Tragedy, he made an adaptation of Moliere's Metlecin malgre" lui, which had already been imitated in English by Mrs. Centlivre and others. This little piece, to which he gave the title of the Mock-Doctor; or, Thr Dumb Lady

i.] EARLY PLAYS. 23

was well received. The French original was ren- dered with tolerable closeness ; but here and there Fielding has introduced little touches of his own, as, for instance, where Gregory (Sganarelle) tells his wife Dorcas (Martine), whom he has just been beating, that as they are but one, whenever he beats her he beats half of himself. To this she replies by requesting that for the future he will beat the other half. An entire scene (the thirteenth) was also added at the desire of Miss Raftor, who played Dorcas, and thought her part too short. This is apparently intended as a burlesque of the notorious quack Misaubin, to whom the Mock-Doctor was ironically dedicated. He was the proprietor of a famous pill, and was introduced by Hogarth into the Harlot's Progress. Gregory was played by Theophilus Gibber, and the preface contains a complimentary refer- ence to his acting, and the expected retirement of his father from the stage. Neither Genest nor Lawrence gives the date when the piece was first produced, but if the " April " on the dubious author's benefit ticket attri- buted to Hogarth be correct, it must have been in the first months of 1732.

The cordial reception of the Mock-Doctor seems to have encouraged Fielding to make further levies upon Moliere, and he speaks of his hope to do so in the " Preface." As a matter of fact, he produced a version of L'Avare at Drury Lane in the following year, which entirely out- shone the older versions of Shadwell and Ozell, and gained from Voltaire the praise of having added to the original "quelques beauUs de dialogue particulikres h sd (Fielding's) nation" Lovegold, its leading role, became a stock part. It was well played by its first actor Griffin,

24 FIELDING. [.HAP.

and was a favourite exercise with Macklin, Shuter, and (in our own days) Phelps.

In Febniary 1733, when the Miser was first acted, Fielding was five and twenty. His means at this time were, in all probability, exceedingly uncertain. The small proportion of money due to him at his mother's death had doubtless been long since exhausted, and he must have been almost wholly dependent upon the pre- carious profits of his pen. That he was assisted by rich and noble friends to any material extent appears, in spite of Murphy, to be unlikely. At all events, an occa- sional dedication to the Duke of Richmond or the Earl of Chesterfield cannot be regarded as proof positive. Lyttelton, who certainly befriended him in later life, was for a great part of this period absent on the Grand Tour, aud Ralph Allen had not yet come forward. In default of the always deferred allowance, his father's house at Salisbury (?) was no doubt open to him ; and it is plain, from indications in his minor poems, that he occasionally escaped into the country. But in London he lived for the most part, and probably not very worshipfully. What, even now, would be the life of a young man of Fielding's age, fond of pleasure, careless of the future, very liberally equipped with high spirits, and straightway exposed to the perilous seductions of the stage ? Field- ing had the defects of liis qualities, and was no better than the rest of those about him. He was manly, and frank, and generous; but these characteristics could scarcely protect him from the terrors of the tip-staff, and the sequels of "t'other bottle." Indeed, he very honestly and unfeignedly confesses to the lapses of his youth in the Journey from this World to the Nertt adding

I.] EARLY PLAYS. 25

that he pretended " to very little Virtue more than gene- ral Philanthropy and private Friendship." It is there- fore but reasonable to infer that his daily life must have been more than usually characterised by the vicissitudes of the eighteenth -century prodigal, — alternations from the " Rose " to a Clare-Market ordinary, from gold-lace to fustian, from champagne to "British Burgundy." In a rhymed petition to Walpole, dated 1730, he makes pleasant mirth of what no doubt was sometimes sober truth — his debts, his duns, and his dinnerless condition, He (the verses tell us)

— from his Garret can look down Ou the whole Street of Arlington" 1 Again —

" The Family that dines the latest Is in our Street esteem'd the greatest ; But latest Hours must surely fall Before him who ne'er dines at all ;" and

"This too doth in my Favour speak, Your Levee is but twice a Week ; From mine I can exclude but one Day, My Door is quiet on a Sunday."

When he can admit so much even jestingly of himself, it is but legitimate to presume that there is no great ex- aggeration in the portrait of him in 1735, by the anony- mous satirist of Seasonable Repi'oof: —

-g, who yesterday appear'd so rough,

Clad in coarse Prize, and plaister'd down with Snvff, See how his Instant gaudy Trappings shine ; What Play-house Bard was ever seen so fine ! But this, not from his Humour flow?, you'll say,

1 \Yhere Sir Robert lived.

2fl FIELDING. [CHAP.

But mere Necessity ; — for last Night lay

In Pawn, the Velvet which he wears to Day."

His work bears traces of the inequalities and irregu- larities of his mode of living. Although in certain cases (e.g. the revised edition of Tom Thumb) the artist and scholar seems to have spasmodically asserted himself, the majority of his plays were hasty and ill-considered performances, most of which (as Lady Mary said) he would have thrown into the fire " if meat could have been got without money, and money without scribbling." " When he had contracted to bring on a play, or a farce," says Murphy, " it is well known, by many of his friends now living, that he would go home rather late from a tavern, and would, the next morning, deliver a scene to the players, written upon the papers which had wrapped the tobacco, in which he so much delighted." It is not easy to conceive, unless Fielding's capacities as a smoker were unusual, that any large contribution to dramatic litera- ture could have been made upon the wrappings of Virginia or Freeman's Best; but that his reputation for careless production was established among his con- temporaries is manifest from the following passage in a burlesque Author's Will published in the Universal Spectator of Oldys : —

" Item, I give and bequeath to my very negligent Friend Henry Drama, Esq., all my INDUSTRY. And whereas the World may think this an unnecessary Legacy, forasmuch as the said Henry Drama, Esq., brings on the Stage four Pieces every Season ; yet as such Pieces are always wrote with un- common Sapidity, and during such fatal Intervals only as the Stocks have been on the Fall, this Legacy will be of use to him to revise and correct his Works. Furthermore, for fear the said Henry Drama should make an ill Use of the

i.] EARLY PLAYS. 27

said Industry, and expend it all on a Ballad Farce, it's my Will the said Legacy should be paid him by equal Portions, and as his Necessities may require."

There can be little doubt that the above quotation, which is reprinted in the Gentleman's for July 1734, and seems to have hitherto escaped inquiry, refers to none other than the " very negligent " Author of the Modern Husband and the Old Debauchees — in other words, to Henry Fielding.

CHAPTER II.

MORE PLAYS — MARRIAGE— THE LICENSING ACT.

THE very subordinate part in the Miser of " Furnish, an Upholsterer," was taken by a third-rate actor, whose surname has been productive of no little misconception among Henry Fielding's biographers. This was Timothy Fielding, sometime member of the Haymarket and Drury Lane companies, and proprietor, for several suc- cessive years, of a booth at Bartholomew, Southwark, and other fairs. In the absence of any Christian name, Mr. Lawrence seems to have rather rashly concluded that the Fielding mentioned by Genest as having a booth at Bartholomew Fair in 1 733 with Hippisley (the original Peachiun of the Beggar's Opera), was Fielding the dramatist; and the mistake thus originated at once began that prosperous course which usually awaits any slip of the kind. It misled one notoriously careful inquirer, who, in his interesting chronicles of Bartholo- mew Fair, minutely investigated the actor's history, giving precise details of his doings at "Bartlemy" from 1728 to 1736; but, although the theory involved obvious in- consistencies, apparently without any suspicion that the proprietor of the booth which stood, season after season, in the yard of the George Inn at Smithfield, was an

CHAP, ii.] MORE PLAYS. 29

entirely different person from his greater namesake. The late Dr. Eimbault carried the story farther still, and attempted to show, in Notes and Queries for May 1859, that Henry Fielding had a booth at Tottenham Court in 1738, "subsequent to his admission into the Middle Temple ; " and he also promised to supply addi- tional particulars to the effect that even 1738 was not the "Zrts^year of Fielding's career as a booth-proprietor." At this stage (probably for good reasons) inquiry seems to have slumbered, although, with the fatal vitality of error, the statement continued (and still continues) to be repeated in various quarters. In 1875, however, Mr. Frederick Latreille published a short article in Notes and Queries, proving conclusively, by extracts from contempo- rary newspapers and other sources, that the Timothy Fielding above referred to was the real Fielding of the fairs; that he became landlord of the Buffalo Tavern "at the corner of Bloomsbury Square" in 1733; and that he died in August 1738, his Christian name, so often suppressed, being duly recorded in the register of the neighbouring church of St. George's, where he was buried. The admirers of our great novelist owe Mr. Latreille a debt of gratitude for this opportune dis- covery. It is true that a certain element of Bohemian picturesqueness is lost to Henry Fielding's life, already not very rich in recorded incident ; and it would certainly have been curious if he, who ended his days in trying to dignify the judicial office, should have begun life by acting the part of a " trading justice," namely that of Quorum in Coffey's Beggar's Wedding, which Timothy Fielding had played at Drury Lane. But, on the whole, it is satisfactory to know that hia early experiences did not,

30 FIELDING. [CHAP.

of necessity, include those of a strolling player. Some obscure and temporary connection with Bartholomew Fair he may have had, as Smollett, in the scurrilous pamphlet issued in 1742, makes him say that he blew a trumpet there in quality of herald to a collection of wild beasts; but this is probably no more than an earlier and uglier form of the apparition laid by Mr. Latreille. The only positive evidence of any connection between Henry Fielding and the Smithfield carnival is, that Theophilus Gibber's company played the Miser at their booth in August 1733.

With the exception of the Miser and an afterpiece, never printed, entitled Deborah ; or, A Wife for you all, which was acted for Miss Raftor's benefit in April 1733, nothing important was brought upon the stage by Fielding until January of the following year, when he produced the Intriguing Chambermaid, and a revised version of the Author's Farce. By a succession of changes, which it is impossible here to describe in detail, consider- able alterations had taken place in the management of Drury Lane. In the first place, Wilks was dead, and his share in the Patent was represented by his widow. Booth also was dead, and Mrs. Booth had sold her share to Giffard of Goodman's Fields, while the elder Gibber had retired. At the beginning of the season of 1733-34 the leading patentee was an amateur called Highmore, who had purchased Gibber's share. He had also purchased part of Booth's share before his death in May 1733. The only other shareholder of importance was Mrs. Wilks. Shortly after the opening of the theatre in September, the greater part of the Drury Lane Company, led by the younger Gibber, revolted

n.] MORE PLAYS. 31

from Highmore and Mrs. Wilks, and set up for them- selves. Matters were farther complicated by the fact that John Eich had not long opened a new theatre in Covent Garden, which constituted a fresh attraction; and that what Fielding called the " wanton affected Fondness for foreign Musick," was making the Italian opera a dangerous rival — the more so as it was patronised by the nobility. Without actors, the patentees were in serious case. Miss Raftor, who about this time became Mrs. Clive, appears, however, to have remained faithful to them, as also did Henry Fielding. The lively little comedy of the Intriguing Chambermaid was adapted from Regnard especially for her; and in its published form was preceded by an epistle in which the dramatist dwells upon the " Factions and Divisions among the Players," and compliments her upon her compassionate adherence to Mr. Highmore and Mrs. Wilks in their time of need. The epistle is also valuable for its warm and generous testimony to the private character of this accomplished actress, whose part in real life, says Fielding, was that of " the best Wife, the best Daughter, the best Sister, and the best Friend." The words are more than mere com- pliment ; they appear to have been true. Madcap and humourist as she was, no breath of slander seems ever to have tarnished the reputation of Kitty Clive, whom Johnson — a fine judge, when his prejudices were not actively aroused — called in addition "the best player that he ever saw."

The Intriguing Chambermaid was produced on the 15th of January 1734. Lettice, from whom the piece was named, was well personated by Mrs. Clive, and Colonel Bluff by Macklin, the only actor of any promise that

32 FIELDING. [CHAP.

Highmore had been able to secure. With the new comedy the Author's Farce was revived It would be unnecessary to refer to this again, but for the addi- tions that were made to it These consisted chiefly in the substitution of Marplay Junior for Sparkish, the actor- manager of the first version. The death of Wilks may have been a reason for this alteration ; but a stronger was no doubt the desire to throw ridicule upon Theo- philus Gibber, whose behaviour in deserting Drury Lane immediately after his father had sold his share to High- more had not passed without censure, nor hail his father's action escaped sarcastic comment. Theophilus Gibber — whose best part was Beaumont and Fletcher's Copper Captain, and who carried the impersonation into private life — had played in several of Fielding's pieces; but Fielding had linked his fortunes to those of the paten- tees, and was consequently against the players in this quarrel The following scene was accordingly added to the farce for the exclusive benefit of "Young Mar- play":-

"Marplay junior. Mr. Luckless, I kiss your Hands — Sir, I am your most obedient humble Servant ; you see, Mr. Luckiest, what Power you have over me. I attend your Commands, tho' several Persons of Quality Lave staid at Court for me above this Hour.

Luckless. I am obliged to you — I have a Tragedy for your House, Mr. Marplay.

Mar. jun. Ha ! if you will send it me, I will give you my Opinion of it ; and if I can make any Alterations in it that will be for its Advantage, I will do it freely.

Witmore. Alterations, Sir ?

Afar. jun. Yes, Sir, Alterations — I will maintain it, let a Play be never so good, without Alteration it will do nothing.

Wii. Very odd indeed.

ii.] MORE PLAYS. 33

Mar. jun. Did you ever write, Sir ?

Wit. No, Sir, I thank Heav'n.

Mar. jun. Oh ! your humble Servant — your very humble Servant, Sir. When you write yourself you will find the Necessity of Alterations. Why, Sir, wou'd you guesa that I had alter'd Shakespear ?

Wit. Yes, faith, Sir, no one sooner.

Mar. jun. Alack-a-day ! Was you to see the Plays when they are brought to us — a Parcel of crude, undigested Stuff. We are the Persons, Sir, who lick them into Form, that mould them into Shape — The Poet make the Play indeed ! The Colour-man might be as well said to make the Picture, or the Weaver the Coat : My Father and I, Sir, are a Couple of poetical Tailors ; when a Play is brought us, we consider it as a Tailor does his Coat, we cut it, Sir, we cut it : And let me tell you, we have the exact Measure of the Town, we know how to fit their Taste. The Poets, between you and me, are a Pack of ignorant

Wit. Hold, hold, sir. This is not quite so civil to Mr. Luckless : Besides, as I take it, you have done the Town the Honour of writing yourself.

Mar. jun. Sir, you are a Man of Sense ; and express your- self well. I did, as you say, once make a small Sally into Parnassus, took a sort of flying Leap over Helicon : But if ever they catch me there again — Sir, the Town have a Pre- judice to my Family ; for if any Play cou'd have made them ashamed to damn it, mine must. It was all over Plot. It wou'd have made half a dozen Novels : Nor was it cram'd with a pack of Wit-traps, like Congreve and Wycherly, where every one knows when the Joke was coming. I defy the sharpest Critick of 'em all to know when any Jokes of mine were coming. The Dialogue was plain, easy, and natural, and not one single Joke in it from the Beginning to the End : Besides, Sir, there was one Scene of tender melancholy Con- versation, enough to have melted a Heart of Stone ; and yet they damn'd it : And they damn'd themselves ; for they shall have no more of mine.

Wit. Take pity on the Town, Sir.

Mar. jun. I ! No, Sir, no. I'll write no more. No more ; unless I am forc'd to it.

84 FIELDING. [CHAP.

Luckless. That's no easy thing, Marplay. Mar. jun. Yes, Sir. Odes, Odes, a Man may be oblig'd to write those you know."

These concluding lines plainly refer to the elder Gibber's appointment as Laureate in 1730, and to those "annual Birth-day Strains," with which he so long de- lighted the irreverent ; while the alteration of Shake- speare and the cobbling of plays generally, satirised again in a later scene, are strictly in accordance with contemporary accounts of the manners and customs of the two dictators of Drury Lane. The piece indicated by Marplay Junior was probably Theophilus Gibber's Lover, which had been produced in January 1731 with very moderate success.

After the Intriguing Chambermaid and the revived Author's Farce, Fielding seems to have made farther exertions for "the distressed Actors in Drury Lane." He had always been an admirer of Cervantes, frequent references to whose master-work are to be found scattered through his plays ; and he now busied himself with com- pleting and expanding the loose scenes of the comedy of Don Quixote in England, which (as before stated) he had sketched at Leyden for his own diversion. He had already thought of bringing it upon the stage, but had been dissuaded from doing so by Gibber and Booth, who regarded it as wanting in novelty. Now, however, he strengthened it by the addition of some election scenes, in which — he tells Lord Chesterfield in the dedication — he designed to give a lively repre- sentation of "the Calamities brought on a Country by general Corruption;" and it was duly rehearsed. But unexpected delays took place in its production ;

ii.] MORE PLAYS. 35

the revolted players returned to Drury Lane; and, lest the actors' benefits should further retard its ap- pearance by postponing it until the winter season, Fielding transferred it to the Haymarket, where, accord- ing to Geneste, it was acted in April 1734. As a play, Don Quixote in England has few stage qualities and no plot to speak of. But the Don with his whimsies, and Sancho with his appetite and string of proverbs, are con- ceived in something of the spirit of Cervantes. Squire Badger, too, a rudimentary Squire Western, well repre- sented by Macklin, is vigorously drawn ; and the song of his huntsman Scut, beginning with the fine line " The dusky Night rides down the Sky," has a verse that recalls a practice of which Addison accuses Sir Roger do Coverley : —

" A brushing Fox in yonder Wood,

Secure to find we seek ; For why, I carry'd sound and good, A Cartload there last Week.

And a Hunting we will go."

The election scenes, though but slightly attached to the main story, are keenly satirical, and considering that Hogarth's famous series of kindred prints belongs to a much later date, must certainly have been novel, as may be gathered from the following little colloquy between Mr. Mayor and Messrs. Guzzle and Retail : —

"Mayor (to Retail). ... I like an Opposition, because otherwise a Man may be oblig'd to vote against his Party ; therefore when we invite a Gentleman to stand, we invite him to spend his Money for the Honour of his Party ; and rhen both Parties have spent as much as they are able, every honest Man will vote according to his Conscience.

36 FIELDING. [CHAP.

Gus. Mr. Mayor talks like a Man of Sense and Honour, and it does me good to hear him.

May. Ay, ay, Mr. Guzzle, I never gave a Vote contrary to my Conscience. I have very earnestly recommended the Country-Interest to all my Brethren : But before that, I recommended the Town-Interest, that is, the interest of this Corporation ; and first of all I recommended to every parti- cular Man to take a particular Care of himself. And it is with a certain way of Reasoning, That he who serves me best, will serve the Town best ; and he that serves the Town best, will serve the Country best"

In the January and February of 1735 Fielding pro- duced two more pieces at Drury Lane, a farce and a five- act comedy. The farce — a lively trifle enough — was An Old Man taught Wisdom, a title subsequently changed to the Virgin Unmasked. It was obviously written to display the talents of Mrs. Clive, who played in it her favourite character of a hoyden, and, after "interview- ing " a number of suitors chosen by her father, finally ran away with Thomas the footman — a course in those days not without its parallel in high life, above stairs as well as below. It appears to have succeeded, though Bookish, one of the characters, was entirely withdrawn in deference to some disapprobation on the part of the audience; while the part of Wormwood, a lawyer, which is found in the latest editions, is said to have been "omitted in representation." The comedy, entitled The Universal Gallant; or, Tlw different Husbands, -was scarcely so fortunate. Notwithstanding that Quin, who, after an absence of many years, had returned to Drury Lane, played a leading part, and that Theophilus Gibber in the hero, Captain Smart, seems to have been fitted with a character exactly suited to his talents and idiosyncrasy,

ii.] MORE PLAYS. 37

the play ran no more than three nights. Till the third act was almost over, " the Audience," says the Prompter (as quoted by "Sylvanus Urban"), "sat quiet, in hopes it would mend, till finding it grew worse and worse, they lost all Patience, and not an Expression or Sentiment afterwards pass'd without its deserved Censure." Perhaps it is not to be wondered at that the author — " the prolifick Mr. Fielding," as the Prompter calls him, attributed its con- demnation to causes other than its lack of interest. In his Advertisement he openly complains of the "cruel Usage" his "poor Play" had met with, and of the bar- barity of the young men about town who made "a Jest of damning Plays" — a pastime which, whether it pre- vailed in this case or not, no doubt existed, as Sarah Fielding afterwards refers to it in David Simple. If an author — he goes on to say — " be so unfortunate [as] to depend on the success of his Labours for his Bread, he must be an inhuman Creature indeed, who would out of sport and wantonness prevent a Man from getting a Livelihood in an honest and inoffensive Way, and make a jest of starving him and his Family." The plea is a good one if the play is good ; but if not, it is worthless. In this respect the public are like the French Cardinal in the story; and when the famished writer's work fails to entertain them, they are fully justified in doubting his raison d'etre. There is no reason for supposing that the Universal Gallant deserved a better fate than it met with. Judging from the time which elapsed between the production of this play and that of Pasquin (Fielding's next theatrical venture), it has been conjectured that the interval was occupied by his marriage, and brief experi- ence as a Dorsetshire country gentleman. The exact

88 FIELDING. [CHAP.

date of his marriage is not known, though it is generally assumed to have taken place in the beginning of 1735. But it may well have been earlier, for it will be observed that in the above quotation from the Preface to the Universal Gallant, which is dated from "Buckingham Street, Feb. 12," he indirectly speaks of "his family." This, it is true, may be no more than the pious fraud of a bachelor ; but if it be taken literally, we must conclude that his marriage was already so far a thing of the past that he was already a father. This supposition would account for the absence of any record of the birth of a child during his forthcoming residence at East Stour, by the explanation that it had already happened in London ; and it is not impossible that the entry of the marriage, too, may be hidden away in some obscure Metropolitan parish register, since those of Salisbury have been fruitlessly searched. At this distance of time, how- ever, speculation is fruitless ; and, in default of more definite information, the " spring of 1735," which Keight- ley gives, must be accepted as the probable date of the marriage.

Concerning the lady, the particulars are more precise. She was a Miss Charlotte Cradock, one of three sisters living upon their own means at Salisbury, or — as it was then styled — New Sarum. Mr. Keightley's personal inquiries, circa 1858, elicited the information that the family, now extinct, was highly respectable, but not of New Sarum's best society. Richardson, in one of his male- volent outbursts, asserted that the sisters were illegiti- mate; but, says the writer above referred to, "of this circumstance we have no other proof, and I am able to add that the tradition of Salisbury knows nothing of it"

n.] MARRIAGE. 39

They were, however, celebrated for their personal attrac- tions ; and if the picture given in chap. ii. book iv. of Tom Jones accurately represents the first Mrs. Fielding, she must have been a most charming brunette. Something of the stereotyped characteristics of a novelist's heroine obviously enter into the description ; but the luxuriant black hair, which, cut "to comply with the modern Fashion," "curled so gracefully in her Neck," the lustrous eyes, the dimple in the right cheek, the chin rather full than small, and the complexion having "more of the Lilly than of the Kose," but flushing with exercise or modesty, are, doubtless, accurately set down. In speak- ing of the nose as " exactly regular," Fielding appears to have deviated slightly from the truth ; for we learn from Lady Louisa Stuart that, in this respect, Miss Cradock's appearance had "suffered a little" from an accident mentioned in book ii. of Amelia, the overturning of a chaise. Whether she also possessed the mental qualities and accomplishments which fell to the lot of Sophia Western, we have no means of determining ; but Lady Stuart is again our authority for saying that she was as amiable as she was handsome.

From the love-poems in the first volume of the Mis- cellanies of 1743 — poems which their author declares to have been " Productions of the Heart rather than of the Head " — it is clear that Fielding had been attached to his future wife for several years previous to 1735. One

of them, Advke to the Nymphs of Neiv S m, celebrates

the charms of Celia — the poetical equivalent for Charlotte — as early as 1730; another, containing a reference to the player Anthony Boheme, who died in 1731, was probably written at the same time; while a

40 FIELDING. [CHAP.

third, in which, upon the special intervention of Jove himself, the prize of beauty is decreed by Venus to the Salisbury sisters, may be of an earlier date than any. The year 1730 was the year of his third piece, the Author's Farct, and he must therefore have been paying his addresses to Miss Cradock not very long after his arrival in London. This is a fact to be borne in mind. So early an attachment to a good and beautiful girl, living no farther off than Salisbury, where his own father probably resided, is scarcely consistent with the reckless dissipation which has been laid to his charge, although, on his own showing, he was by no means faultless. But it is a part of natures like his to exaggerate their errors in the moment of repentance ; and it may well be that Henry Fielding, too, was not so black as he painted him- self. Of his love-verses he says — " this Branch of Writ- ing is what I very little pretend to ;" and it would be misleading to rate them highly, for, unlike his literary descendant, Mr. Thackeray, he never attained to any special quality of note. But some of his octosyllabics, if they cannot be called equal to Prior's, fall little below Swift's. " I hate " — cries he in one of the pieces,

" I hate the Town, and all ite Ways ; Ridotto's, Opera's, and Plays ; The Ball, the Ring, the Mall, the Court ; Wherever the Beau-Monde resort . . . All Coffee-Houses, and their Praters ; All Courts of Justice, and Debaters ; All Taverns, and the Sots within 'em ; All Bubbles, and the Rogues that skin 'em,"

— and so forth, the natural anti-climax being that he loves nothing but his "Charmer" at Salisbury. In an-

n.] MARRIAGE. 41

other, which is headed To Celia. — Occasioned by her appre- hending her House would be broke open, and having an old Fellow to guard it, who sat up all Night, with a Gun without any Ammunition, and from which it has been concluded that the Miss Cradocks were their own landlords, Venus chides Cupid for neglecting to guard her favourite : —

" ' Come tell me, Urchin, tell no lies ; Where was you hid, in Vince's eyes ? Did you fair Bennet's Breast importune ? (I know you dearly love a Fortune.) ' Poor Cupid now began to whine ; ' Mamma, it was no Fault of mine. I in a Dimple lay perdue, That little Guard -Boom chose by you. A hundred Loves (all arni'd) did grace The Beauties of her Neck and Face ; Thence, by a Sigh I dispossest, Was blown to Harry Fielding's Breast ; Where I was forc'd all Night to stay, Because I could not find my Way. But did Mamma know there what Work I've made, how acted like a Turk; What Pains, what Torment he endures, Which no Physician ever cures, She would forgive.' The Goddess smil'd, And gently chuck'd her wicked Child, Bid him go back, and take more Care, And give her Service to the Fair."

Swift, in his Rhapsody on Poetry, 1733, coupled Field- ing with Leonard Welsted as an instance of sinking in verse. But the foregoing, which he could not have seen, is scarcely, if at all, inferior to his own Birthday Poems to Stella.1

1 Swift afterwards substituted "the laureate [Gibber]' for " Fielding," and appears to have changed his mind as to the latter's merits. " I can assure Mr. Fielding" says Mrs. Pilkington in the

42 FIELDING. [.HAP.

The history of Fielding's marriage rests so exclu- sively upon the statements of Arthur Murphy that it will be well to quote his words in full : —

" Mr. Fielding had not been long a writer for the stage, when he married Miss Craddock [aic], a beauty from Salisbury. About that time, his mother dying, a moderate estate, at Slower in Dorsetshire, devolved to him.- To that place he retired with his wife, on whom he doated, with a resolution to bid adieu to all the follies and intemperances to which he had addicted himself in the career of a town-life. But un- fortunately a kind of family-pride here gained an ascendant over him ; and he began immediately to vie in splendour with the neighbouring country 'squires. With an estate not much above two hundred pounds a-year, and his wife's for- tune, which did not exceed fifteen hundred pounds, he encumbered himself with a large retinue of servants, all clad in costly yellow liveries. For their master's honour, these people could not descend so low as to be careful in their apparel, but, in a month or two, were unfit to be seen ; the 'squire's dignity required that they should be new-equipped; and his chief pleasure consisting in society and convivial mirth, hospitality threw open his doors, and, in less than three years, entertainments, hounds, and horses, entirely de- voured a little patrimony, which, had it been managed with ceconomy, might have secured to him a state of independence for the rest of his life, etc."

This passage, which has played a conspicuous part in all biographies of Fielding, was very carefully sifted by Mr. Keightley, who came to the conclusion that it was a "mere tissue of error and inconsistency."1 Without going to this length, we must admit that it is manifestly

third and last volume of her Memoirs (1754), "the Dean had a high opinion of his Wit, which must be a Pleasure to him, as no Man was ever better qualified to judge, possessing it so eminently himself."

1 Some of Mr. Keightley's criticisms were anticipated by Watson.

n.] MARRIAGE. 43

incorrect in many respects. If Fielding married in 1735 (though, as already pointed out, he may have mar- ried earlier, and retired to the country upon the failure of the Universal Gallant), he is certainly inaccurately described as "not having been long a writer for the stage," since writing for the stage had been his chief occupation for seven years. Then again his mother had died as far back as April 10, 1718, when he was a boy of eleven ; and if he had inherited anything from her, he had probably been in the enjoyment of it ever since he came of age. Furthermore, the statement as to " three years " is at variance with the fact that, according to the dedication to the Universal Gallant, he was still in Lon- don in February 1735, and was back again managing the Haymarket in the first months of 1736. Murphy, however, may only mean that the "estate" at East Stour was in his possession for three years. Mr. Keightley's other points — namely, that the "tolerably respectable farm-house," in which he is supposed to have lived, was scarcely adapted to " splendid entertain- ments," or " a large retinue of servants ;" and that, to be in strict accordance with the family arms, the liveries should have been not "yellow," but white and blue — must be taken for what they are worth. On the whole, the probability is, that Murphy's words were only the care- less repetition of local tittle-tattle, of much of which, as Captain Booth says pertinently in Amelia, "the only basis is lying." The squires of the neighbourhood would naturally regard the dashing young gentleman from London with the same distrustful hostility that Addison's "Tory Foxhunter" exhibited to those who differed with him in politics. It would be remembered,

44 FIELDING. [CHAP.

besides, that the new-comer was the son of another and an earlier Fielding of less pretensions, and no real cor- diality could ever have existed between them. Indeed, it may be assumed that this was the case, for Booth's account of the opposition and ridicule which he — " a poor renter ! " — encountered when he enlarged his farm and set up his coach has a distinct personal accent. That he was lavish, and li ved beyond his means, is quite in accord- ance with his character. The man who, as a Bow Street magistrate, kept open house on a pittance, was not likely to be less lavish as a country gentleman, with XI 500 in his pocket, and newly married to a young and handsome wife. " He would have wanted money," said Lady Mary, "if his hereditary lands had been as extensive as his imagination ; " and there can be little doubt that the rafters of the old farm by the Stour, with the great locust tree at the back, which is figured in Hutchins's History of Dorset, rang often to hunting choruses, and that not sel- dom the " dusky Night rode down the Sky " over the prostrate forms of Harry Fielding's guests.1 But even £1 500, and (in spite of Murphy) it is by no means clear that he had anything more, could scarcely last for ever. Whether his footmen wore yellow or not, a few brief months found him again in town. That he was able

1 An interesting relic of the East Stour residence has recently been presented by Mr. Merthyr Guest (through Mr. R. A. Kinglake) to the Somersetshire Archaeological Society. It is an oak table of solid proportions, and bears on a brass plate the following inscrip- tion, emanating from a former owner : — "This table belonged to Henry Fielding, Esq., novelist. He hunted from East Stour Farm, 1718, and iii three years dissipated his fortune keeping hounds." In 1718, it may be observed, Fielding was a boy of eleven. Prob- ably the whole of the hitter sentence is nothing more than a dis- tortion of Murphy.

II.] MORE PLAYS. 45

to rent a theatre may perhaps be accepted as proof that his profuse hospitalities had not completely exhausted his means.

The moment was a favourable one for a fresh theat- rical experiment. The stage -world was split up into factions, the players were disorganised, and everything seemed in confusion. Whether Fielding himself con- ceived the idea of making capital out of this state of things, or whether it was suggested to him by some of the company who had acted Don Quixote in England, it is impossible to say. In the first months of 1736, however, he took the little French Theatre in the Haymarket, and opened it with a company which he christened the " Great Mogul's Company of Comedians," who were further described as "having dropped from the Clouds." The "Great Mogul" was a name some- times given by playwrights to the elder Gibber; but there is no reason for supposing that any allusion to him was intended on this occasion. The company, with the ex- ception of Mack! in, who was playing at Drury Lane, consisted chiefly of the actors in Don Quixote in England; and the first piece was entitled Pasquin: a Dramatick Satire on the Times : being the Rehearsal of Two Plays, viz. a Comedy call'd the Election, and a Tragedy call'd the Life and Death of Common-Sense. The form of this work, which belongs to the same class as Sheridan's Critic and Buck- ingham's Rehearsal, was probably determined by Fielding's past experience of the public taste. His latest comedy had failed, and its predecessors had not been very suc- cessful. But his burlesques had met with a better reception, while the election episodes in Don Quixote had seemed to disclose a fresh field for the satire of con-

46 FIELDING. [CHAP.

temporary manners. And in the satire of contemporary manners he felt his strength lay. The success of Pasquin proved he had not miscalculated, for it ran more than forty nights, drawing, if we may believe the unknown author of the life of Theophilus Gibber, numerous and enthusiastic audiences " from Grosvenor, Cavendish, Han- over, and all the other fashionable Squares, as also from Pall Mall, and the Inns of Court."

In regard to plot, the comedy which Pasquin contains scarcely deserves the name. It consists of a string of loosely-connected scenes, which depict the shameless poli- tical corruption of the Walpole era with a good deal of boldness and humour. The sole difference between the " Court party," represented by two Candidates with the Bunyan-like names of Lord Place and Colonel Promise, and the " Country party," whose nominees are Sir Harry Fox-Chace and Squire Tankard, is that the former bribe openly, the latter indirectly. The Mayor, whose sym- pathies are with the " Country party " is finally in- duced by his wife to vote for and return the other side, although they are in a minority ; and the play is con- cluded by the precipitate marriage of his daughter with Colonel Promise. Mr. Fustian, the Tragic Author, who, with Mr. Sneerwell the Critic, is one of the spectators of the rehearsal, demurs to the abruptness with which this ingenious catastrophe is brought about, and inquires where the preliminary action, of which there is not the slightest evidence in the piece itself, has taken place. Thereupon Trapwit, the Comic Author, replies as follows, in one of those passages which show that, whatever Fielding's dramatic limitations may have been, he was at least a keen critic of stage practice : —

ii.] MORE PLAYS. 47

" Trapwit. Why, behind the Scenes, Sir. What, would you have every Thing brought upon the Stage ? I intend to bring ours to the Dignity of the French Stage ; and I have Horace's Advice of iny Side ; we have many Things both said and done in our Comedies, which might be better perform'd behind the Scenes : The French, you know, banish all Cruelty from their Stage ; and I don't see why we should bring on a Lady in ours, practising all manner of Cruelty upon her Lover : beside, Sir, we do not only produce it, but encourage it ; for I could name you some Comedies, if I would, where a Woman is brought in for four Acts together, behaving to a worthy Man in a Manner for which she almost deserves to be hang'd ; and in the Fifth, forsooth, she is rewarded with him for a Husband : Now, Sir, as I know this hits some Tastes, and am willing to oblige all, I have given every Lady a Latitude of thinking mine has behaved in whatever Manner she would have her."

The part of Lord Place in the Election, after the first few nights, was taken by Gibber's daughter, the notorious Mrs. Charlotte Charke, whose extraordinary Memoirs are among the curiosities of eighteenth-cen- tury literature, and whose experiences were as varied as those of any character in fiction. She does not seem to have acted in the Life and Death of Common-Sense, the rehearsal of which followed that of the Election. This is a burlesque of the Tom Thumb type, much of which is written in vigorous blank verse. Queen Common-Sense is conspired against by Firebrand, Priest of the Sun, by Law, and by Physic. Law is incensed because she has endeavoured to make his piebald jargon intelli- gible; Physic because she has preferred Water Gruel to all his drugs; and Firebrand because she would restrain the power of Priests. Some of the strokes must have gone home to those receptive hearers who, as one contemporary account informs us, " were dull enough

48 FIELDING. [CHAP.

not only to think they contain'd Wit and Humour, but Truth also":—

" Queen Common-Sense. My Lord of Lav, I sent for you

this Morning ;

I have a strange Petition given to me ; Two Men, it seems, have lately been at Law For an Estate, which both of them have lost, And their Attorneys now divide between them.

Law. Madam, these things will happen in the Law.

Q. C. S. Will they, my Lord ? then better we had none : But I have also heard a sweet Bird sing, That Men, unable to discharge their Debta At a short Warning, being sued for them, Have, with both Power and Will their Debts to pay Lain all their Lives in Prison for their Costs.

Law. That may perhaps be some poor Person's Case, Too mean to entertain your Royal Ear.

Q. 0. S. My Lord, while I am Queen I shall not think One Man too mean, or poor, to be redress'd ; Moreover, Lord, I am inform'd your Laws Are grown BO large, and daily yet encrease, That the great Age of old Methusakm Would scarce suffice to read your Statutes out."

There is also much more than merely transitory satire in the speech of " Firebrand " to the Queen : —

" Firebrand. Ha ! do you doubt it ? nay, if you doubt

that,

I will prove nothing — But my zeal inspires me, And I will tell you, Madam, you yourself Are a most deadly Enemy to the Sun, And all his Priests have greatest Cause to wish You had been never born.

Q. C. S. Ha ! say'st thou, Priest ? Then know I honour and adore the Sun ! And when I see his Light, and feel his Warmth, I glow with naming Gratitude toward him ; But know, I never will adore a Priest,

II j MORE PLAYS. 49

Who wears Pride's Face beneath Religion's Mask. And makes a Pick-Lock of his Piety, To steal away the Liberty of Mankind. But while I live, I'll never give thee Power.

Firebrand. Madam, our Power is not deriv'd from yon, Nor any one : 'Twas sent us in a Box From the great Sun himself, and Carriage paid ; Phaeton brought it when he overturn'd The Chariot of the Sun into the Sea.

Q. 0. S. Shew me the Instrument, and let me read it.

Fireb. Madam, you cannot read it, for being thrown Into the Sea, the Water has so damag'd it, That none but Priests could ever read it since."

In the end, Firebrand stabs Common-Sense, but her Ghost frightens Ignorance off the Stage, upon which Sneerwell says — "I am glad you make Common-Sense get the better at last; I was under terrible Appre- hensions for your Moral." " Faith, Sir," says Fustian, "this is almost the only Play where she has got the better lately." And so the piece closes. But it would be wrong to quit it without some reference to the numberless little touches by which, throughout the whole, the humours of dramatic life behind the scenes are ironically depicted. The Comic Poet is arrested on his way from "King's Coffee-House," and the claim being "for upwards of Four Pound," it is at first supposed that " he will hardly get Bail." He is subsequently inquired after by a Gentlewoman in a Kiding-Hood, whom he passes off as a Lady of Quality, but who, in reality, is bringing him a clean shirt. There are difficulties with one of the Ghosts, who has a "Church-yard Cough," and "is so Lame he can hardly walk the Stage;" while another comes to rehearsal without being properly floured, because the stage barber has gone to Drury Lane " to shave the

£

50 FIELDING. [CHAP.

Sultan in the New Entertainment." On the other hand, the Ghost of Queen Common-Sense appears before she is killed, and is with some difficulty persuaded that her action is premature. Part of " the Mob " play truant to see a show in the park ; Law, straying without the play- house passage is snapped up by a Lord Chief-Justice's Warrant; and a Jew carries off one of the Maids of Honour. These little incidents, together with the un- blushing realism of the Pots of Porter that are made to do duty for wine, and the extra two -penny worth of Lightning that is ordered against the first night, are all in the spirit of that inimitable picture of the Strolling Actresses dressing in a Barn, which Hogarth gave to the world two years later, and which, very possibly, may have borrowed some of its inspiration from Fielding's "dramatic satire."

There is every reason to suppose that the profits of Pasquin were far greater than those of any of its author's previous efforts. In a rare contemporary caricature, preserved in the British Museum,1 the "Queen of Common-Sense " is shown presenting " Henry Fielding, Esq.," with a well-filled purse, while to "Harlequin" (John Rich of Covent Garden) she extends a halter; and in some doggerel lines underneath, reference is made to the "show'rs of Gold" resulting from the piece. This, of course, might be no more than a poetical fiction ; but Fielding himself attests the pecuniary suc- cess of Pasquin in the Dedication to Tumble-Down Dick, and Mrs. Charke's statement in her Memoirs that her salary for acting the small part of Lord Place was four guineas a week, "with an Indulgence in Point of » Political and Personal Satires, No. 2287.

n.l MORE PLAYS. 61

Charges at her Benefit" by which she cleared sixty guineas, certainly points to a prosperous exchequer. Fielding's own benefit, as appears from the curious ticket attributed to Hogarth and facsimiled by A. M. Ireland, took place on April 25, but we have no record of the amount of his gains. Mrs. Charke farther says that "soon after Pasquin began to droop," Fielding pro- duced Lillo's Fatal Curiosity in which she acted Agnes. This tragedy, founded on a Cornish story, is one of remarkable power and passion ; but upon its first appear- ance it made little impression, although in the succeed- ing year it was acted to greater advantage in combination with another satirical medley by Fielding, the Historical Register for the Year 1736.

Like most sequels, the Historical Register had neither the vogue nor the wit of its predecessor. It was only half as long, and it was even more disconnected in character. "Harmonious Gibber," as Swift calls him, whose " preposterous Odes " had already been ridicule* in Pasquin and the Author's Farce, was once more brought on the stage as Ground-Ivy, for his alterations of Shake- speare ; and under the name of Pistol, Theophilus Gibber is made to refer to the contention between his second wife, Arne's sister, and Mrs. Clive, for the honour of playing "Polly" in the Beggar's Opera, a play-house feud which at the latter end of 1736 had engaged " the Town " almost as seriously as the earlier rivalry of Faustina and Cuzzoni. This continued raillery of the Gibbers is, as Fielding himself seems to have felt, a " Jest a little over- acted ;" but there is one scene in the piece of undeniable freshness and humour, to wit, that in which Cock, the famous salesman of the Piazzas — the George Robins of

62 FIELDING. [CHAP

his day — is brought on the stage as Mr. Auctioneer Hen (a part taken by Mrs. Charke). His wares, " collected by the indefatigable Pains of that celebrated Virtuoso, Peter Humdrum, Esq.," include such desirable items as " curious Eemnants of Political Honesty," " delicate Pieces of Patriotism," Modesty (which does not obtain a bid), Courage, Wit, and " a very neat clear Conscience " of great capacity, " which has been worn by a Judge, and a Bishop." The "Cardinal Virtues" are then put up, and eighteen-pence is bid for them. But after they have been knocked down at this extravagant sum, the buyer complains that he had understood the auctioneer to say " a Cardinal's Virtues," and that the lot he has purchased includes " Temperance and Chastity, and a Pack of Stuff that he would not give three Farthings for." The whole of this scene is "admirable fooling;" and it was after- wards impudently stolen by Theophilus Gibber for his farce of the Auction. The Historical Register concludes with a dialogue between Quidam, in whom the audience recognised Sir Robert Walpole, and four patriots, to whom he gives a purse which has an instantaneous effect upon their opinions. All five then go off dancing to Quidam's fiddle ; and it is explained that they have holes in their pockets through which the money will fall as they dance, enabling the donor to pick it all up again, " and so not lose one Half-penny by his Generosity."

The frank effrontery of satire like the foregoing had by this time begun to attract the attention of the Ministry, whose withers had already been sharply wrung by Pasquin; and it has been conjectured that the ballet of Quidam and the Patriots played no small part in precipitating the famous "Licensing Act," which was

n.] MORE PLAYS. 53

passed a few weeks afterwards. Like the marriage which succeeded the funeral of Hamlet's father, it certainly " followed hard upon." But the reformation of the stage had already been contemplated by the Legislature ; and two years before, Sir John Barnard had brought in a bill "to restrain the number of houses for playing of Interludes, and for the better regulating of common Players of Interludes." This, however, had been aban- doned, because it was proposed to add a clause enlarging the power of the Lord Chamberlain in licensing plays, an addition to which the introducer of the measure made strong objection. He thought the power of the Lord Chamberlain already too great, and hi support of his argu- ment he instanced its wanton exercise in the case of Gay's Polly, the representation of which had been suddenly prohibited a few years earlier. But Pasquin and the Register brought the question of dramatic lawlessness again to the front, and a bill was hurriedly drawn, one effect of which was to revive the very provision that Sir John Barnard had opposed. The history of this affair is exceedingly obscure, and in all probability it has never been completely revealed. The received or authorised version is to be found in Coxe's Life of Wai- pole. After dwelling on the offence given to the Govern- ment by Pasquin, the writer goes on to say that Giffard, the manager of Goodman's Fields, brought Walpole a farce called The Golden Rump, which had been pro- posed for exhibition. Whether he did this to extort money, or to ask advice, is not clear. In either case, Walpole is said to have " paid the profits which might have accrued from the performance, and detained the copy." He then made a compendious selection of the

64 FIELDING. [CHAP.

treasonable and profane passages it contained. These he submitted to independent members of both parties, and afterwards read them in the House itself. The result was that by way of amendment to the " Vagrant Act " of Anne's reign, a bill was prepared limiting the number of theatres, and compelling all dramatic writers to obtain a license from the Lord Chamberlain. Such is Coxe's account; but notwithstanding its circumstantial character, it has been insinuated in the sham memoirs of the younger Gibber, and it is plainly asserted in the Ramblers Maga- zine for 1787, that certain preliminary details have been conveniently suppressed. It is alleged that Walpole himself caused the farce in question to be written, and to be offered to Giffard, for the purpose of introducing his scheme of reform ; and the suggestion is not without a certain remote plausibility. As may be guessed, however, The Golden Mump cannot be appealed to. It was never printed, although its title is identical with that of a caricature published in March 1737, and fully described in the Gentleman's Magazine for that month. If the play at all resembled the design, it must have been obscene and scurrilous in the extreme.1

Meanwhile the new bill, to which it had given rise, passed rapidly through both Houses. Report speaks of animated discussions and warm opposition. But there are no traces of any divisions, or petitions against it,

1 Horace Walpole, in his Jfemoires of the Last Ten Fears of the Reign of George II., says (voL i. p. 12), " I have in my possession the imperfect copy of this piece as I found it among my father's papers after his death. " He calls it Fielding's ; but no importance can be attached to the statement. There is a copy of the caricature in the British Museum Print Room (Political aud Personal Satires, No. 2327).

n.J LICENSING ACT. 55

and the only speech which has survived is the very elaborate and careful oration delivered in the Upper House by Lord Chesterfield. The " second Cicero " — as Sylvanus Urban styles him — opposed the bill upon the ground that it would affect the liberty of the press ; and that it was practically a tax upon the chief property of men of letters, their wit — a " precarious dependence " — which (he thanked God) my Lords were not obliged to rely upon. He dwelt also upon the value of the stage as a fearless censor of vice and folly ; and he quoted with excellent effect but doubtful accuracy the famous answer of the Prince of Conti [Conde] to Moliere [Louis XIV.] when Tartu/e was interdicted at the instance of M. de Lamoignon : — " It is true, Moliere, Harlequin ridicules Heaven, and exposes religion ; but you have done much worse — you have ridiculed the first minister of religion." This, although not directly advanced for the purpose, really indicated the head and front of Fielding's offend- ing in Pasquin and the Historical Register, and although in Lord Chesterfield's speech the former is ironically con- demned, it may well be that Fielding, whose Don Quixote had been dedicated to his Lordship, was the wire-puller in this case, and supplied this very illustration. At all events it is entirely in the spirit of Firebrand's words in Pasquin : —

" Speak boldly ; by the Powers I serve, I swear You speak in Safety, even tho' you speak Against the Gods, provided that you speak Not against Priests."

But the feeling of Parliament in favour of drastic legislation was even stronger than the persuasive periods

56 FIELDING. [CHAF.

of Chesterfield, and on the 21st of June 1737 the bill received the royal assent.

With its passing Fielding's career as a dramatic author practically closed. In his dedication of the Historical Register to "the Publick," he had spoken of his desire to beautify and enlarge his little theatre, and to procure a better company of actors ; and he had added — " If Nature hath given me any Talents at ridiculing Vice and Imposture, I shall not be indolent, nor afraid of exerting them, while the Liberty of the Press and Stage subsists, that is to say, while we have any Liberty left among us." To all these projects the "Licensing Act " effectively put an end ; and the only other plays from his pen which were produced subsequently to this date were the "Wedding Day," 1743, and the posthu- mous Good-Natured Man, 1779, both of which, as is plain from the Preface to the Miscellanies, were among his earliest attempts. In the little farce of Miss Lucy in Town, 1742, he had, he says, but "a very small Share." Be- sides these, there are three hasty and flimsy pieces which belong to the early part of 1737. The first of these, Tumble-Down Dick; or, Phaeton in the Suds, was a dra- matic sketch in ridicule of the unmeaning Entertain- ments and Harlequinades of John Rich at Covent Garden. This was ironically dedicated to Rich, under his stage name of "John Lun," and from the dedication it appears that Rich had brought out an unsuccessful satire on Pasquin called Marfvrio. The other two were Eurydice, a profane and pointless farce, afterwards printed by its author (in anticipation of Beaumarchais) "as it was d — mned at the Theatre -Royal in Drury- Lane;" and a few detached scenes in which, under the

ii. J LICENSING ACT. »9

title of Eurydice Hiss'd ; or, a Word to the Wise, its un- toward fate was attributed to the "frail Promise of uncertain Friends." But even in these careless and half- considered productions there are happy strokes; and one scarcely looks to find such nervous and sensible lines in a mere & propos as these from Eurydice Hiss'd : —

" Yet grant it shou'd succeed, grant that by Chance, Or by the Whim and Madness of the Town, A Farce without Contrivance, without Sense Should run to the Astonishment of Mankind ; Think how you will be read in After-times, When Friends are not, and the impartial Judge Shall with the meanest Scribbler rank your Name ; Who would not rather wish a Butler's fame, Distress'd, and poor in every thing but Merit, Than be the blundering Laureat to a Court ?"

Self-accusatory passages such as this — and there are others like it — indicate a higher ideal of dramatic writing than Fielding is held to have attained, and probably the key to them is to be found in that reaction of better judgment which seems invariably to have followed his most reckless efforts. It was a part of his sanguine and impulsive nature to be as easily per- suaded that his work was worthless as that it was excellent. "When," says Murphy, "he was not under the immediate urgency of want, they, who were intimate with him, are ready to aver that he had a mind greatly superior to anything mean or little ; when his finances were exhausted, he was not the most elegant in his choice of the means to redress himself, and he would instantly exhibit a farce or a puppet -shew in the Haymarket theatre, which was wholly inconsistent with the profes- sion he had embarked in." The quotation displays all

56 FIELDING. [,;HAP.

Murphy's loose and negligent way of dealing with his facts ; for, with the exception of Miss Lucy in Town, which can scarcely be ranked among his works at all, there is absolutely no trace of Fielding's having exhibited either " puppet-shew " or " farce " after seriously adopting the law as a profession, nor does there appear to have been much acting at the Haymarket for some time after his management had closed in 1737. Still, his superficial characteristics, which do not depend so much upon Murphy as upon those " who were intimate with him," are probably accurately described, and they sufficiently account for many of the obvious discordances of his work and life. That he was fully conscious of something higher than his actual achievement as a dramatist is clear from his own observation in later life, "^that he left off writing for the stage, when he ought to have begun ;" — an utterance which (we shrewdly suspect) has prompted not a little profitless speculation as to whether, if he had continued to write plays, they would have been equal to, or worse than, his novels. The discussion would be highly interesting, if there were the slightest chance that it could be attended with any satisfactory result But the truth is, that the very materials are wanting. Fielding " left off writing for the stage " when he was under thirty; Tom Jones was published in 1749, when he was more than forty. His plays were written in haste ; his novels at leisure, and when, for the most part, he was relieved from that " immediate urgency of want," which, according to Murphy, characterised his younger days. If — as has been suggested — we could compare a novel written at thirty with a play of the same date, or a play written at forty with Tom Jones,

ii. J LICENSING ACT. r>9

the comparison might be instructive, although even then considerable allowances would have to be made for the essential difference between plays and novels. But, as we cannot make such a comparison, further inquiry is simply waste of time. All we can safely affirm is, that the plays of Fielding's youth did not equal the fictions of his maturity; and that, of those plays, the comedies were less successful than the farces and bur- lesques. Among other reasons for this latter difference one chiefly may be given : — that in the comedies he sought to reproduce the artificial world of Congreve and Wycherley, while in the burlesques and farces he depicted the world in which he lived.

CHAPTER III.

THE CHAMPION— JOSEPH ANDREWS.

THE Historical Register and Eurydice Hiss'd were pub- lished together in June 1737. By this time the "Licensing Act" was passed, and the "Grand Mogul's Company " dispersed for ever. Fielding was now in his thirty-first year, with a wife and probably a daughter depending on him for support. In the absence of any prospect that he would be able to secure a main- tenance as a dramatic writer, he seems to have decided, in spite of his comparatively advanced age, to revert to the profession for which he had originally been intended, and to qualify himself for the Bar. Accord- ingly, at the close of the year, he became a student of the Middle Temple, and the books of that society contain the following record of his admission : * —

[574 G] 1 Naif* 1737.

Henrictu Fielding, de East Stour in Com Dorset Ar,filiut et tueree apparens Brig : Genlil : Edmundi Fielding admissus at in Societatem Medii Templi Lond specialiter et obligatur una cum etc.

Et dot pro fine 4. 0. 0.

It may be noted, as Mr. Keightley has already

1 This differs slightly from previous transcripts, having been verified at the Middle Temple.

CHAP, in.} THE CHAMPION. 61

observed, that Fielding is described in this entry as of East Stour, " which would seem to indicate that he still retained his property at that place;" and further, that his father is spoken of as a " brigadier-general," whereas (according to the Gentleman's Magazine) he had been made a major-general in December 1735. Of dis- crepancies like these it is idle to attempt any explana- tion. But, if Murphy is to be believed, Fielding devoted himself henceforth with remarkable assiduity to the study of law. The old irregularity of life, it is alleged, occasionally asserted itself, though without checking the energy of his application. "This," says his first bio- grapher, " prevailed in him to such a degree, that he has been frequently known, by his intimates, to retire late at night from a tavern to his chambers, and there read, and make extracts from, the most abstruse authors, for several hours before he went to bed; so powerful were the vigour of his constitution and the activity of his mind." It is to this passage, no doubt, that we owe the picturesque wet towel and inked ruffles with which Mr. Thackeray has decorated him in Pendennis; and, in all probability, a good deal of graphic writing from less able pens respecting his modus vivendi as a Templar. In point of fact, nothing is known with certainty respect- ing his life at this period; and what it would really concern us to learn — namely, whether by "chambers" it is to be understood that he was living alone, and, if so, where Mrs. Fielding was at the time of these pro- tracted vigils — Murphy has not told us. Perhaps she was safe all the while at East Stour, or with her sisters at Salisbury. Having no precise information, however, it can only be recorded, that, in spite of the fitful

62 FIELDING. [.-HAP.

outbreaks above referred to, Fielding applied himself to the study of his profession with all the vigour of a man who has to make up for lost time ; and that, when on the 20th of June 1740 the day came for his being " called," he was very fairly equipped with legal know- ledge. That he had also made many friends among his colleagues of Westminster Hall is manifest from the number of lawyers who figure in the subscription list of the Miscellanies.

To what extent he was occupied by literary work during his probationary period it is difficult to say. Murphy speaks vaguely of " a large number of fugitive political tracts;" but unless the Essay on Conversation^ advertised by Lawton Gilliver in 1737, be the same as that afterwards reprinted in the Miscellanies, there is no positive record of anything until the issue of True Great- ness, an epistle to George Dodington, in January 1741, though he may, of course, have written much anony- mously. Among newspapers, the one Murphy had in mind was probably the Champion, the first number of which is dated November 15, 1739, two years after his admission to the Middle Temple as a student. On the whole, it seems most likely, as Mr. Keightley con- jectures, that his chief occupation in the interval was studying law, and that he must have been living upon the residue of his wife's fortune or his own means, in which case the establishment of the above periodical may mark the exhaustion of his resources.

The Champion is a paper on the model of the elder essayists. It was issued, like the Taller, on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Murphy says that Fielding's part in it cannot now be ascertained ; but as the

in.] THE CHAMPION. 63

" Advertisement " to the edition in two volumes of 1741 states expressly that the papers signed C. and L. are the " Work of one Hand," and as a number of those signed C are unmistakably Fielding's, it is hard to discover where the difficulty lay. The papers signed C. and L. are by far the most numerous, the majority of the remainder being distinguished by two stars, or the signature "Lilbourne." These are understood to have been from the pen of James Kalph, whose poem of Night gave rise to a stinging couplet in the Dunciad, but who was nevertheless a man of parts, and an industrious writer. As will be remembered, he had contributed a prologue to the Temple Beau, so that his association with Fielding must have been of some standing. Besides Ralph's essays in the Champion, he was mainly responsible for the Index to the Times which accompanied each number, and consisted of a series of brief paragraphs on current topics, or the last new book. In this way Glover's London, Boyse's Deity, Somervile's Hobbinol, Lillo's Elmeric, Dyer's Ruins of Rome, and other of the very minor poetce minor es of the day, were commented upon. These notes and notices, however, were only a subordinate feature of the Champion, which, like its prede- cessors, consisted chiefly of essays and allegories, social, moral, and political, the writers of which were supposed to be members of an imaginary "Vinegar family," described in the initial paper. Of these the most pro- minent was Captain Hercules Vinegar, who took all questions relating to the Army, Militia, Trained-Bands, and "fighting Part of the Kingdom." His father, Nehemiah Vinegar, presided over history and politics ; his uncle, Counsellor Vinegar, over law and judicature ;

84 FIELDING. [CHAP.

and Dr. John Vinegar his cousin, over medicine and natu- ral philosophy. To others of the family — including Mrs. Joan Vinegar, who was charged with domestic affairs — were allotted classic literature, poetry and the Drama, and fashion. This elaborate scheme was not very strictly adhered to, and the chief writer of the group is Captain Hercules.

Shorn of the contemporary interest which formed the chief element of its success when it was first pub- lished, it must be admitted that, in the present year of grace, the Champion is hard reading. A kind of lassitude — a sense of uncongenial task-work — broods heavily over Fielding's contributions, except the one or two in which he is quickened into animation by his antagonism to Gibber ; and although, with our know- ledge of his after achievements, it is possible to trace some indications of his yet unrevealed powers, in the absence of such knowledge it would be difficult to distinguish the Champion from the hundred-and-one for- gotten imitators of the Spectator and Toiler, whose names have been so patiently chronicled by Dr. Nathan Drake. There is, indeed, a certain obvious humour in the account of Captain Vinegar's famous club, which he had inherited from Hercules, and which had the enviable property of falling of itself upon any knave in company, and there is a dash of the Tom Jones manner in the noisy activity of that excellent housewife Mrs. Joan. Some of the lighter papers, such as the one upon the " Art of Puffing," are amusing enough ; and of the visions, that which is based upon Lucian, and represents Charon as stripping his freight of all their superfluous incumbrances in order to lighten his boat, has a double

in.] THE CHAMPION. 65

interest, since it contains references not only to Gibber, but also (though this appears to have been hitherto overlooked) to Fielding himself. The " tall Man," who at Mercury's request strips off his " old Grey Coat with great Readiness," but refuses to part with "half his Chin," which the shepherd of souls regards as false, is clearly intended for the writer of the paper, even without the confirmation afforded by the subsequent allusions to his connection with the stage. His " length of chin and nose," sufficiently apparent in his portrait, was a favourite theme for contemporary personalities. Of the moral essays, the most remarkable are a set of four papers, entitled An Apology for the Clergy, which may perhaps be regarded as a set-off against the sarcasms of Pasquin on priestcraft. They depict, with a great deal of knowledge and discrimination, the pattern priest as Fielding conceived him. To these may be linked an earlier picture, taken from life, of a country parson who, in his simple and dignified surroundings, even more closely resembles the Vicar of Wakefield than Mr. Abraham Adams. Some of the more general articles contain happy passages. In one there is an admirable parody of the Norman-French jargon, which in those days added superfluous obscurity to legal utterances ; while another, on " Charity," contains a forcible exposi- tion of the inexpediency, as well as inhumanity, of imprisonment for debt. References to contemporaries, the inevitable Gibber excepted, are few, and these seem mostly from the pen of Ralph. The following, from that of Fielding, is notable as being one of the earliest authoritative testimonies to the merits of Hogarth : "I esteem (says he) the ingenious Mr. Hogarth as one of

F

86 FIELDING. [CHAP

the most useful Satyrists any Age hath produced. In his excellent Works you see the delusive Scene exposed with all the Force of Humour, and, on casting your Eyes on another Picture, you behold the dreadful and fatal Consequence. I almost dare affirm that those two Works of his, which he calls the Rake's and the Harlofs Progress, are calculated more to serve the Cause of Virtue, and for the Preservation of Mankind, than all the Folio's of Morality which have been ever written ; and a sober Family should no more be without them, than without the Whole Duty of Man in their House." He returned to the same theme in the Preface to Joseph Andrews with a still apter phrase of appreciation : — " It hath been thought a vast Commendation of a Painter, to say his Figures seem to breathe ; but surely, it is a much greater and nobler Applause, that they appear to think." *

When the Champion was rather more than a year old, Colley Gibber published his famous Apology. To the attacks made upon him by Fielding at different times he had hitherto printed no reply — perhaps he had no opportunity of doing so. But in his eighth chapter, when speaking of the causes which led to the Licensing Act, he takes occasion to refer to his assailant in terms which Fielding must have found exceedingly galling. He carefully abstained from mentioning his name, on the ground that it could do him no good, and was of

1 Fielding occasionally refers to Hogarth for the pictorial types of his characters. Bridget Allworthy, he tells us, resembled the starched prude in Morning; and Mrs. Partridge and Parson Thwackum have their originals in the Harlot's Progress. It was Fielding, too, who said that the Enraged Musician was "enough to make a man deaf to look at " ( Voyage to Lisbon, 1755, p. 50).

in.! THE CHAMPION. 67

no importance ; but he described him as " a broken Wit," who had sought notoriety "by raking the Chan- nel" (i.e. Kennel), and "pelting his Superiors." He accused him, with a scandalised gravity that is as edify- ing as Chesterfield's irony, of attacking "Religion, Laws, Government, Priests, Judges, and Ministers." He called him, either in allusion to his stature, or his pseudonym in the Champion, a "Herculean Satyrist," a " Drawcansir in Wit" — "who, to make his Poetical Fame immortal, like another Erostratus, set Fire to his Stage, by writing up to an Act of Parliament to demolish it. I shall not," he continues, "give the particular Strokes of his Ingenuity a Chance to be re- membered, by reciting them ; it may be enough to say, in general Terms, they were so openly flagrant, that the Wisdom of the Legislature thought it high time, to take a proper Notice of them."

Fielding was not the man to leave such a challenge unanswered. In the Champion for April 22, 1740, and two subsequent papers, he replied with a slashing criti- cism of the Apology, in which, after demonstrating that it must be written in English because it was written in no other language, he gravely proceeds to point out examples of the author's superiority to grammar and learning — and in general, subjects its pretentious and slip-shod style to a minute and highly detrimental examination. In a further paper he returns to the charge by a mock trial of one "Col. Apol" (i.e. Colley- Apology], arraigning him for that, " not having the Fear of Grammar before his Eyes," he had committed an unpardonable assault upon his mother-tongue. Field- ing's knowledge of legal forms and phraseology enabled

08 FIELDING. [. IIAI-.

him to make a happy parody of court procedure, and Mr. Lawrence says that this particular "jeu d 'esprit ob- tained great celebrity." But the happiest stroke in the controversy — as it seems to us — is one which escaped Mr. Lawrence, and occurs in the paper already referred to, where Charon and Mercury are shown denuding the luckless passengers by the Styx of their surplus impedi- menta. Among the rest, approaches " an elderly Gen- tleman with a Piece of wither'd Laurel on his head." From a little book, which he is discovered (when stripped) to have bound close to his heart, and which bears the title of Love in a Riddle — an unsuccessful pastoral produced by Gibber at Drury Lane in 1729 — it is clear that this personage is intended for none other than the Apologist, who, after many entreaties, is finally compelled to part with his treasure. " I was surprized," continues Fielding, " to see him pass Examination with his Laurel on, and was assured by the Standers by, that Mercury would have taken it off, if he had seen it"

These attacks in the Champion do not appear to have received any direct response from Gibber. But they were reprinted in a rambling production issued from "Curll's chaste press" in 1740, and entitled the Tryal of Colley Gibber, Comedian, &c. At the end of this there is a short address to " the Self-dubb'd Captain Hercules Vinegar, alias Buffoon," to the effect that "the malevolent Flings exhibited by him and his Man Ralph," have been faithfully reproduced. Then comes the following curious and not very intelligible " Advertisement : " —

" If the Ingenious Henry Fielding Esq. ; (Son of the Hon. Lieut. General Fielding, who upon his Return from hie Travels entered himself of the Temple in order to study the

Hi.] THE CHAMPION. 69

Law, and married one of the pretty Miss Cradocks of Salisbury) will own himself the AUTHOR of 18 strange Things called Tragical Comedies and Comical Tragedies, lately advertised by J. Watte, of Wild-Court, Printer, he shall be mentioned in Capitals in the Third Edition of Mr. GIBBER'S Life, and like- wise be placed among the Poetce minores Dramatici of the Present Age : Then will both his Name and Writings be remembered on Record in the immortal Poetical Register written by Mr. GILES JACOB."

The "poetical register" indicated was the book of that name, containing the Lives and Characteristics of the English Dramatic Poets, which Mr. Giles Jacob, an industrious literary hack, had issued in 1723. Mr. Lawrence is probably right in his supposition, based upon the foregoing advertisement, that Fielding " had openly expressed resentment at being described by Gibber as ' a broken wit,' without being mentioned by name." He never seems to have wholly forgotten his animosity to the actor, to whom there are frequent references in Joseph Andrews; and, as late as 1749, he is still found harping on " the withered laurel " in a letter to Lyttel- ton. Even in his last work, the Voyage to Lisbon, Gibber's name is mentioned. The origin of this protracted feud is obscure ; but, apart from want of sympathy, it must probably be sought for in some early misunderstanding between the two in their capacities of manager and author. As regards Theophilus Gibber, his desertion of Highmore was sufficient reason for the ridicule cast upon him in the Author's Farce and elsewhere. With Mrs. Charke, the Laureate's intractable and eccentric daughter, Fielding was naturally on better terms. She was, as already stated, a member of the Great Mogul's Company, and it is worth noting that some of the sar-

70 FIELDING. [CHAP.

casms in Pasquin against her father were put into the mouth of Lord Place, whose part was taken by this un- dutiful child. All things considered, both in this con- troversy and the later one with Pope, Gibber did not come off worst His few hits were personal and un- scrupulous, and they were probably far more deadly in their effects than any of the ironical attacks which his adversaries, on their part, directed against his poeti- cal ineptitude or halting " parts of speech." Despite his superlative coxcombry and egotism, he was, moreover, a man of no mean abilities. His Careless Husband is a far better acting play than any of Fielding's, and his Apology, which even Johnson allowed to be " well-done," is valu- able in many respects, especially for its account of the contemporary stage. In describing an actor or actress he had few equals — witness his skilful portrait of Nokes, and his admirably graphic vignette of Mrs. Verbruggen as that "finish'd Impertinent," Melantha, in Dryden's Marriage brio-Mode.

The concluding paper in the collected edition of the Champion, published in 1741, is dated June 19, 1740. On the day following Fielding was called to the Bar by the benchers of the Middle Temple, and (says Mr. Lawrence) "chambers were assigned him in Pump Court." Simultaneously with this, his regular connection with journalism appears to have ceased, although from his statement in the Preface to the Miscellanies, — that " as long as from June 1741," he had "desisted from writing one Syllable in the Champion, or any other public Paper," — it may perhaps be inferred that up to that date he continued to contribute now and then. This, neverthe- less, is by no means clear. His last utterance in the pub-

HI.] THE CHAMPION. 71

lished volumes is certainly in a sense valedictory, as it refers to the position acquired by the Champion, and the difficulty experienced in establishing it. Incidentally, it pays a high compliment to Pope, by speaking of " the divine Translation of the Iliad, which he [Fielding] has lately with no Disadvantage to the Translator COMPARED with the Original," the point of the sentence so impressed by its typography, being apparently directed against those critics who had condemned Pope's work without the requisite knowledge of Greek. From the tenor of the rest of the essay it may, however, be concluded that the writer was taking leave of his enterprise ; and, according to a note by Boswell, in his Life of Johnson, it seems that Mr. Eeed of Staple Inn possessed documents which showed that Fielding at this juncture, probably in anticipation of more lucrative legal duties, surrendered the reins to Ealph. The Champion continued to exist for some time longer ; indeed, it must be regarded as long-lived among the essayists, since the issue which contained its well-known criticism on Garrick is No. 455, and appeared late in 1742. But as far as can be ascertained, it never again obtained the honours of a reprint.

Although, after he was called to the Bar, Fielding practically relinquished periodical literature, he does not seem to have entirely desisted from writing. In Sylvanus Urban's Register of Books, published during January 1741, is advertised the poem Of True Great- ness afterwards included in the Miscellanies; and the same authority announces the Prernonia,d, an anonymous burlesque Epic prompted by Admiral Vernon's popular expedition against Porto Bello in 1739, "with six Ships

72 FIELDING. [CHAP.

only." That Fielding was the author of the latter is sufficiently proved by his order to Mr. Nourse (printed in Roscoe's edition), to deliver fifty copies to Mr Chappel. Another sixpenny pamphlet, entitled The Opposition, a Vision, issued in December of the same year, is enu- merated by him, in the Preface to the Miscellanies, among the few works he had published "since the End of June 1741 ;" and, provided it can be placed before this date, he may be credited with a political sermon called the Crisis (1741), which is ascribed to him upon the authority of a writer in Nichols's Anecdotes. He may also, before "the End of June 1741," have written other things ; but it is clear from his Caveat in the above-mentioned " Preface," together with his complaint that " he had been very unjustly censured, as well on account of what he had not writ, as for what he had," that much more has been laid to his charge than he ever deserved. Among ascriptions of this kind may be mentioned the curious Apology for the Life of Mr. The' Gibber, Comedian, 1740, which is described on its title-page as a proper sequel to the autobiography of the Laureate, in whose " style and manner " it is said to be written. But, although this performance is evidently the work of some one well acquainted with the dramatic annals of the day, it is more than doubtful whether Fielding had any hand or part in it Indeed, his own statement that " he never was, nor would be the Author of anonymous Scandal [the italics are ours] on the private History or Family of any Person whatever," should be regarded as conclusive.

During all this time he seems to have been steadily applying himself to the practice of his profession, if,

in.] JOSEPH ANDREWS. 73

indeed, that weary hope deferred which forms the usual probation of legal preferment can properly be so de- scribed. As might be anticipated from his Salisbury connections, he travelled the Western Circuit; and, according to Hutchins's Dorset, he assiduously attended the Wiltshire sessions. He had many friends among his brethren of the Bar. His cousin, Henry Gould, who had been called in 1734, and who, like his grand- father, ultimately became a Judge, was also a member of the Middle Temple ; and he was familiar with Charles Pratt, afterwards Lord Camden, whom he may have known at Eton, but whom he certainly knew in his bar- rister days. It is probable, too, that he was acquainted with Lord Northington, then Robert Henley, whose name appears as a subscriber to the Miscellanies, and who was once supposed to contend with Kettleby (another subscriber) for the honour of being the original of the drunken barrister in Hogarth's Midnight Modern Conversation, a picture which no doubt accurately repre- sents a good many of the festivals by which Henry Fielding relieved the tedium of 'composing those MS. folio volumes on Crown or Criminal Law, which, after his death, reverted to his half-brother, Sir John. But to- wards the close of 1741 he was engaged upon another work which has outweighed all his most laborious foren- sic efforts, and which will long remain an English classic. This was The History of the Adventures of Joseph Andrews, and of his Friend Mr. Abraham Adams, published by Andrew Millar in February 1742.

In the same number, and at the same page of the Gentleman's Magazine which contains the advertisement of the Vernoniad, there is a reference to a famous novel

74 FIELDING. [CVAT.

which had appeared in November 1740, two months earlier, and had already attained an extraordinary popularity. " Several Encomiums (says Mr. Urban) on a Series of Familiar Letters, publish'd but last month, entitled PAMELA or Virtue rewarded, came too late for this Magazine, and we believe there will be little Occa- sion for inserting them in our next ; because a Second Edition will then come out to supply the Demands in the Country, it being judged in Town as great a Sign of Want of Curiosity not to have read Pamela, as not to have seen the French and Italian Dancers." A second edition was in fact published in the following month (February), to be speedily succeeded by a third in March and a fourth in May. Dr. Sherlock (oddly misprinted by Mrs. Barbauld as " Dr. Slocock ") extolled it from the pulpit ; and the great Mr. Pope was reported to have gone farther and declared that it would " do more good than many volumes of sermons." Other admirers ranked it next to the Bible ; clergymen dedicated theological treatises to the author ; and " even at Kanelagh " — says Richardson's biographer — " those who remember the publication say, that it was usual for ladies to hold up the volumes of Pamela to one another, to shew that they had got the book that every one was talking of." It is perhaps hypercritical to observe that Ranelagh Gardens were not opened until eighteen months after Mr. Riving- ton's duodecimos first made their appearance; but it will be gathered from the tone of some of the fore- going commendations that its morality was a strong point with the new candidate for literary fame ; and its voluminous title-page did indeed proclaim at large that it was " Published in order to cultivate the Prin-

in.] JOSEPH ANDREWS. 76

ciples of Virtue and Religion in the Minds of the Youth of Both Sexes." Its author, Samuel Eichardson, was a middle-aged London printer, a vegetarian and water- drinker, a worthy, domesticated, fussy, and highly- nervous little man. Delighting in female society, and accustomed to act as confidant and amanuensis for the young women of his acquaintance, it had been sug- gested to him by some bookseller friends that he should prepare a " little volume of Letters, in a common style, on such subjects as might be of use to those country readers, who were unable to indite for themselves." As Hogarth's Conversation Pieces grew into his Pro- gresses, so this project seems to have developed into Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded. The necessity for some connecting link between the letters suggested a story, and the story chosen was founded upon the actual ex- periences of a young servant girl, who, after victoriously resisting all the attempts made by her master to seduce her, ultimately obliged him to marry her. It is needless to give any account here of the minute and deliber- ate way in which Richardson filled in this outline. As one of his critics, D'Alembert, has unanswerably said — " La nature est bonne a imiter, mais non pas jusqu'a I } ennui" — and the author of Pamela has plainly disregarded this useful law. On the other hand, the tedium and elaboration of his style have tended, in these less leisurely days, to condemn his work to a neglect which it does not deserve. Few writers — it is a truism to say so — have excelled him in minute analysis of motive, and knowledge of the human heart. About the final morality of his heroine's long-drawn defence of her chastity it may, however, be permitted to doubt ; and,

7« FIELDING. [CHAP.

in contrasting the book with Fielding's work, it should not be forgotten that, irreproachable though it seemed to the author's admirers, good Dr. Watts complained (and with reason) of the indelicacy of some of the scenes.

But, for the moment, we are more concerned with the effect which Pamela produced upon Henry Fielding, struggling with the " eternal want of pence, which vexes public men," and vaguely hoping for some profitable open- ing for powers which had not yet been satisfactorily exer- cised. To his robust and masculine genius, never very delicately sensitive where the relations of the sexes are concerned, the strange conjunction of purity and precau- tion in Richardson's heroine was a thing unnatural, and a theme for inextinguishable Homeric laughter. That Pamela, through all her trials, could really have cherished any affection for her unscrupulous admirer would seem to him a sentimental absurdity, and the unprecedented success of the book would sharpen his sense of its assailable side. Possibly, too, his acquaintance with Richardson, whom he knew personally, but with whom he could have had no kind of sympathy, disposed him against his work In any case, the idea presently occurred to Fielding of depicting a young man in cir- cumstances of similar importunity at the hands of a dissolute woman of fashion. He took for his hero Pamela's brother, and by a malicious stroke of the pen turned the Mr. B. of Pamela into Squire Booby. But the process of invention rapidly carried him into paths far beyond the mere parody of Richardson, and it is only in the first portion of the book that he really remembers his intention. After chapter x. the story follows its natural course, and there is little or nothing of Lady

in.] JOSEPH ANDREWS. 77

Booby, or her frustrate amours. Indeed, the author Hoes nor even pretend to preserve congruity as regards his hero, for, in chapter v., he makes him tell his mistress that he has never been in love, while in chapter xi. we are informed that he had long been attached to the charming Fanny. Moreover, in the intervening letters which Joseph writes to his sister Pamela, he makes no reference to this long-existent attachment, with which, one would think, she must have been perfectly familiar. These discrepancies all point, not so much to negligence on the part of the author, as to an unconscious transfor- mation of his plan. He no doubt speedily found that mere ridicule of Richardson was insufficient to sustain the interest of any serious effort, and, besides, must have been secretly conscious that the " Pamela " charac- teristics of his hero were artistically irreconcilable with the personal bravery and cudgel-playing attributes with which he had endowed him. Add to this that the immortal Mrs. Slipslop and Parson Adams — the latter especially — ht«d begun to acquire an importance with their creator for which the initial scheme had by no means provided ; and he finally seems to have disre- garded his design, only returning to it in his last chapters in order to close his work with some appearance of con- sistency. The History of Joseph Andrews, it has been said, might well have dispensed with Lady Booby alto- gether, and yet, without her, not only this book, but Tom Jones and Amelia also, would probably have been lost to us. The accident which prompted three such masterpieces cannot be honestly regretted.

It was not without reason that Fielding added promi- nently to his title-page the name of Mr. Abraham Adams

78 FIELDING. [CHAP.

If he is not the real hero of the book, he is undoubtedly the character whose fortunes the reader follows with the closest interest. Whether he is smoking his black and consolatory pipe in the gallery of the inn, or losing his way while he meditates a passage of Greek, or groaning over the fatuities of the man-of-fashion in Leonora's story, or brandishing his famous crabstick in defence of Fanny, he is always the same delightful mixture of benevolence and simplicity, of pedantry and credulity and ignorance of the world. He is " compact," to use Shakespeare's word, of the oddest contradictions, — the most diverting eccentricities. He has Aristotle's Politics at his fingers' ends, but he knows nothing of the daily Gazetteers ; he is perfectly familiar with the Pillars of Hercules, but he has never even heard of the Levant He travels to London to sell a collection of sermons which he has for- gotten to carry with him, and in a moment of excitement he tosses into the fire the copy of &schylus which it has cost him years to transcribe. He gives irreproachable advice to Joseph on fortitude and resignation, but he is overwhelmed with grief when his child is reported to be drowned. When he speaks upon faith and works, on marriage, on school discipline, he is weighty and sensible ; but he falls an easy victim to the plausible professions of every rogue he meets, and is willing to believe in the principles of Mr. Peter Pounce, or the humanity of Parson Tmlliber. Not all the discipline of hog's blood and cudgels and cold water to which he is subjected can deprive him of his native dignity; and as he stands before us in the short great-coat under which his ragged cassock is continually making its appearance, with his old wig and battered hat, a clergy-

in.] JOSEPH ANDREWS. 79

man whose social position is scarcely above that of a footman, and who supports a wife and six children upon a cure of twenty-three pounds a year, which his out- spoken honesty is continually jeopardising, he is a far finer figure than Pamela in her coach-and-six, or Bellarmine in his cinnamon velvet. If not, as Mr. Lawrence says, with exaggerated enthusiasm, "the grandest delineation of a pattern-priest which the world has yet seen," he is assuredly a noble example of primi- tive goodness and practical Christianity. It is certain — as Mr. Forster and Mr. Keightley have pointed out — that Goldsmith borrowed some of his characteristics for Dr. Primrose, and it has been suggested that Sterne re- membered him in more than one page of Tristram Shandy. Next to Parson Adams, perhaps the best character in Joseph Andrews — though of an entirely different type — is Lady Booby's " Waiting-Gentlewoman," the excellent Mrs. Slipslop. Her sensitive dignity, her easy changes from servility to insolence, her sensuality, her inimitably distorted vocabulary, which Sheridan borrowed for Mrs. Malaprop, and Dickens modified for Mrs. Gamp, are all peculiarities which make up a personification of the richest humour and the most life-like reality. Mr. Peter Pounce, too, with his " scoundrel maxims," as disclosed in that remarkable dialogue which is said to be " better worth reading than all the Works of Colley Cibber," and in which charity is defined as consisting rather in a dis- position to relieve distress than in an actual act of relief; Parson Trulliber with his hogs, his greediness, and his willingness to prove his Christianity by fisticuffs; shrewish Mrs. Tow-wouse with her scold's tongue, and her erring but perfectly subjugated husband, — these

80 FIELDING. [CHAP

again are portraits finished with admirable spirit and fidelity. Andrews himself, and his blushing sweetheart, do not lend themselves so readily to humorous art Nevertheless the former, when freed from the wiles of Lady Booby, is by no means a despicable hero, and Fanny is a sufficiently fresh and blooming heroine. The characters of Pamela and Mr. Booby are fairly preserved from the pages of their original inventor. But when Fielding makes Parson Adams rebuke the pair for laughing in church at Joseph's wedding, and puts into the lady's mouth a sententious little speech upon her altered position in life, he is adding some ironical touches which Richardson would certainly have omitted.

No selection of personages, however, even of the most detailed and particular description, can convey any real impression of the mingled irony and insight, the wit and satire, the genial but perfectly remorseless re- velation of human springs of action, which distinguish scene after scene of the book. Nothing, for example, can be more admirable than the different manifestations of meanness which take place among the travellers of the stage-coach, in the oft- quoted chapter where Joseph, having been robbed of everything, lies naked and bleed- ing in the ditch. There is Miss Grave-airs, who protests against the indecency of his entering the vehicle, but like a certain lady in the Rake's Progress, holds the sticks of her fan before her face while he does so, and who is afterwards found to be carrying Nantes under the guise of Hungary-water ; there is the lawyer who advises that the wounded man shall be taken in, not from any humane motive, but because he is afraid of being in- volved in legal proceedings if they leave him to his fate;

in.] JOSEPH ANDREWS. 81

there is the wit who seizes the occasion for a burst of facetious double-meanings, chiefly designed for the dis- comfiture of the prude ; and, lastly, there is the coachman, whose only concern is the shilling for his fare, and who refuses to lend either of the useless greatcoats he is sitting upon, lest " they should be made bloody," leaving the shivering suppliant to be clothed by the generosity of the postilion ("a Lad," says Fielding with a fine touch of satire, " who hath been since transported for robbing a Hen-roost "). This worthy fellow accordingly strips off his only outer garment, " at the same time swearing a great Oath," for which he is duly rebuked by the passengers, " that he would rather ride in his Shirt all his Life, than suffer a Fellow-Creature to lie in so miserable a Condition." Then there are the admirable scenes which succeed Joseph's admission into the inn ; the discussion between the bookseller and the two parsons as to the publication of Adams's sermons, which the "Clergy would be certain to cry down," because they inculcate good works against faith ; the debate before the justice as to the manuscript of ^Eschylus, which is mistaken for one of the Fathers ; and the pleasant discourse between the poet and the player which, be- ginning by compliments, bids fair to end in blows. Nor are the stories of Leonora and Mr. Wilson without their interest They interrupt the straggling narrative far less than the Man of the Hill interrupts Tom. Jones, and they afford an opportunity for varying the epic of the highway by pictures of polite society which could not otherwise be introduced. There can be little doubt, too, that some of Mr. Wilson's town experiences were the reflection of the author's own career; while the charac-

0

82 FIELDING. [CHAP.

teristics of Leonora's lover Horatio, — who was " a young Gentleman of a good Family, bred to the Law," and re- cently called to the Bar, whose "Face and Person were such as the Generality allowed handsome : but he had a Dignity in his Air very rarely to be seen," and who "had Wit and Humour, with an Inclination to Satire, which he indulged rather too much " — read almost like a complimentary description of Fielding himself.

Like Hogarth, in that famous drinking scene to which reference has already been made, Fielding was careful to disclaim any personal portraiture in Joseph Andrews. In the opening chapter of Book iii he declares " once for all that he describes not Men, but Manners ; not an Individual, but a Species," although he admits that his characters are " taken from Life." In his " Preface," he reiterates this profession, adding that in copying from nature, he has " used the utmost Care to obscure the Persons by such different Circum- stances, Degrees, and Colours, that it will be impossible to guess at them with any degree of certainty." Never- theless— as in Hogarth's case — neither his protests nor his skill have prevented some of those identifications which are so seductive to the curious ; and it is gen- erally believed, — indeed, it was expressly stated by Richardson and others, — that the prototype of Parson Adams was a friend of Fielding, the Reverend William Young. Like Adams, he was a scholar and devoted to ^Eschylus ; he resembled him, too, in his trick of snap- ping his fingers, and his habitual absence of mind. Of this latter peculiarity it is related that on one occasion, when a chaplain in Marlborough's wars, he strolled abstractedly into the enemy's lines with his beloved

in.] JOSEPH ANDREWS. 83

jEschylus in his hand. His peaceable intentions were so unmistakable that he was instantly released, and politely directed to his regiment. Once, too, it is said, on being charged by a gentleman with sitting for the portrait of Adams, he offered to knock the speaker down, thereby supplying additional proof of the truth of the allegation. He died in August 1757, and is buried in the Chapel of Chelsea Hospital. The obituary notice in the Gentle- man's Magazine describes him as "late of Gillingham, Dorsetshire," which would make him a neighbour of the novelist.1 Another tradition connects Mr. Peter Pounce with the scrivener and usurer Peter Walter, whom Pope had satirised, and whom Hogarth is thought to have intro- duced into Plate L of Marriage brio-Mode. His sister lived at Salisbury ; and he himself had an estate at Stalbridge Park, which was close to East Stour. From references to Walter in the Champion for May 31, 1740, as well as in the Essay on Conversation, it is clear that Fielding knew him personally, and disliked him. He may, in- deed, have been among those county magnates whose criticism was so objectionable to Captain Booth during his brief residence in Dorsetshire. Parson TruUiber, also, according to Murphy, was Fielding's first tutor — Mr. Oliver of Motcombe. But his widow denied the resemblance ; and it is hard to believe that this portrait is not overcharged In all these cases, how- ever, there is no reason for supposing that Fielding may not have thoroughly believed in the sincerity of his attempts to avoid the exact reproduction of actual persons, although, rightly or wrongly, his present-

1 Lord Thurlow was accustomed to find a later likeness to Field- ing's hero in his protegt, the poet Crabbe.

84 FIELDING. [CHAP.

ments were speedily identified. With ordinaiy people it is by salient characteristics that a likeness is estab- lished ; and no variation of detail, however skilful, greatly affects this result. In our own days we have seen that, in spite of both authors, the public declined to believe that the Harold Skimpole of Charles Dickens, and George Eliot's Dinah Morris, were not perfectly recognisable copies of living originals.

Upon its title-page, Joseph Andrews is declared to be " written in Imitation of the Manner of Cervantes," and there is no doubt that, in addition to being subjected to an unreasonable amount of ill-usage, Parson Adams has manifest affinities with Don Quixote. Scott, how- ever, seems to have thought that Scarron's Roman Comique was the real model, so far as mock-heroic was concerned ; but he must have forgotten that Field- ing was already the author of Tom Thumb, and that Swift had written the Battle of the Books. Resemblances — not of much moment — have also been traced to the Paysan Parvenu and the Histoire de Marianne of Mari- vaux. With both these books Fielding was familiar ; in fact, he expressly mentions them, as well as the Roman Comique, in the course of his story, and they doubtless exercised more or less influence upon his plan. But in the Preface, from which we have already quoted, he describes that plan; and this, because it is something definite, is more interesting than any speculation as to his determining models. After marking the division of the Epic, like the Drama, into Tragedy and Comedy, he points out that it may exist in prose as well as verse, and he proceeds to explain that what he has attempted in Joseph Andrews is "a comic Epic-Poem in Prose,"

in.] JOSEPH ANDREWS. 85

differing from serious romance in its substitution of a light and ridiculous" fable fora "grave and solemn" one, of inferior characters for those of superior rank, and of ludicrous for sublime sentiments. Sometimes in the diction he has admitted burlesque, but never in the sentiments and characters, where, he contends, it would be out of place. He further defines the only source of the ridiculous to be affectation, of which the chief causes are vanity and hypocrisy. Whether this scheme was an after- thought it is difficult to say; but it is certainly necessary to a proper understanding of the author's method — a method which was to find so many imitators. Another passage in the Preface is worthy of remark With reference to the pictures of vice which the book contains, he observes : "First, That it is very difficult to pursue a Series of human Actions, and keep clear from them. Secondly, That the Vices to be found here [i.e. in Joseph Andrews] are rather the accidental Consequences of some human Frailty, or Foible, than Causes habitually existing in the Mind. Thirdly, That they are never set forth as the Objects of Ridicule but Detestation. Fourthly, That they are never the principal Figure at the Time on the Scene ; and, lastly, they never produce the intended Evil" In read- ing some pages of Fielding it is not always easy to see that he has strictly adhered to these principles ; but it is well to recall them occasionally, as constituting at all events the code that he desired to follow.

Although the popularity of Fielding's first novel was considerable, it did not, to judge by the number of editions, at once equal the popularity of the book by which it was suggested. Pamela, as we have seen,

86 FIELDING. [CHAP.

speedily ran through four editions ; but it was six months before Millar published the second and revised edition of Joseph Andrews; and the third did not appear until more than a year after the date of first publication. With Richardson, as might be expected, it was never popular at all, and to a great extent it is possible to sympathise with his annoyance. The daughter of his brain, whom he had piloted through so many troubles, had grown to him more real than the daughters of his body, and to see her at the height of her fame made contemptible by what in one of his letters he terms " a lewd and ungenerous engraftment," must have been a sore trial to his absorbed and self-conscious nature, and one which not all the consolations of his consistory of feminine flatterers — "my ladies," as the little man called them — could wholly alleviate. But it must be admitted that his subsequent attitude was neither judicious nor dignified. He pursued Fielding henceforth with steady depreciation, caught eagerly at any scandal respecting him, professed himself unable to perceive his genius, deplored his "lowness," and comforted himsulf by reflecting that, if he pleased at all, it was because he had learned the art from Pamela. Of Fielding's other contemporary critics, one only need be mentioned here, more on account of his literary eminence than of the special felicity of his judgment. " I have myself," writes Gray to West, " upon your recommendation, been reading Joseph Andrews. The incidents are ill laid and without invention ; but the characters have a great deal of nature, which always pleases even in her lowest shapes. Parson Adams is perfectly well ; so is Mrs. Slipslop, and the story of

in.] JOSEPH ANDREWS. 87

Wilson ; and throughout he [the author] shews himself well read in Stage-Coaches, Country Squires, Inns, and Inns of Court. His reflections upon high people and low people, and misses and masters, are very good. However the exaltedness of some minds (or rather as I shrewdly suspect their insipidity and want of feeling or observation) may make them insensible to these light things, (I mean such as characterise and paint nature) yet surely they are as weighty and much more useful than your grave discourses upon the mind, the passions, and what not." And thereupon follows that fantastic utterance concerning the romances of MM. Marivaux and Cr6billon fils, which has disconcerted so many of Gray's admirers. We suspect that any reader who should nowadays contrast the sickly and sordid intrigue of the Paysan Parvenu with the healthy animalism of Joseph Andrews would greatly prefer the latter. Yet Gray's verdict, though cold, is not undiscriminating, and is per- haps as much as one could expect from his cloistered and fastidious taste.

Various anecdotes, all more or less apocryphal, have been related respecting the first appearance of Joseph Andrews, and the sum paid to the author for the copy- right. A reference to the original assignment, now in the Forster Library at South Kensington, definitely settles the latter point. The amount in " lawful Money of Great Britain," received by " Henry Fielding, Esq." from "Andrew Millar of St. Clement's Danes in the Strand," was £183: lls. In this document, as in the order to Nourse of which a facsimile is given by Eoscoe, both the author's name and signature are written with the old-fashioned double f, and he calls himself " Field-

88 FIELDING. [CHAK ,„.

ing" and not "Feilding," like the rest of the Denbigh family. If we may trust an anecdote given by Kippis, Lord Denbigh once asked his kinsman the reason of this difference. " I cannot tell, my lord," returned the novelist, "unless it be that my branch of the family was the first that learned to spell." In connection with this assignment, however, what is perhaps even more interesting than these discrepancies is the fact that one of the witnesses was William Young. Thus we have Parson Adams acting as witness to the sale of the very book which he had helped to immortalise.

CHAPTER IV.

THE MISCELLANIES — JONATHAN WILD.

IN March 1742, according to an article in the Gentle- man's Magazine, attributed to Samuel Johnson, " the most popular Topic of Conversation " was the Account of the Conduct of the Dowager Dutchess of Marlborough, from her first coming to Court, to the Year 1710, which, with the help of Hooke of the Roman History, the " terrible old Sarah " had just put forth. Among the little cloud of Sarali-Ads and Old Wives' Tales evoked by this production, was a Vindication of her Grace by Fielding, specially prompted, as appears from the title-page, by the "late scurrilous Pamphlet" of a "noble Author." If this were not acknowledged to be from Fielding's pen in the Preface to the Miscellanies (in which collection, however, it is not reprinted), its authorship would be sufficiently proved by its being included with Miss Lucy in Town in the assignment to Andrew Millar referred to at the close of the preceding chapter. The price Millar paid for it was £5 : 5s., or exactly half that of the farce. But it is only reasonable to assume that the Duchess herself (who is said to have given Hooke £5000 for his help) also rewarded her champion. Whether Fielding's

90 FIELDING. [CHAF.

admiration for the "glorious Woman" in whose cause he had. drawn his pen was genuine, or whether — to use Johnson's convenient euphemism concerning Hooke — "he was acting only ministerially," are matters for speculation. His father, however, had served under the Duke, and there may have been a traditional attachment to the Churchills on the part of his family. It has even been ingeniously suggested that Sarah Fielding was her Grace's god-child ; l but as her mother's name was also Sarah, no importance can be attached to the suggestion. Miss Lucy in Town, as its sub-title explains, was a sequel to the Virgin Unmastfd, and was produced at Drury Lane in May 1742. As already stated in chapter ii., Fielding's part in it was small It is a lively but not very creditable trifle, which turns upon certain equivocal London experiences of the Miss Lucy of the earlier piece ; and it seems to have been chiefly intended to afford an opportunity for some clever imi- tation of the reigning Italian singers by Mrs. Clive and the famous tenor Beard. Horace Walpole, who refers to it in a letter to Mann, between an account of the open- ing of Eanelagh and an anecdote of Mrs. Bracegirdle, calls it " a little simple farce," and says that " Mrs. Clive mimics the Muscovita admirably, and Beard Amorevoli tolerably." Mr. Walpole detested the Muscovita, and adored Amorevoli, which perhaps accounts for the nice discrimination shown in his praise. One of the other characters, Mr. Zorobabel, a Jew, was taken by Macklin, and from another, Mrs. Haycock (afterwards changed to Mrs. Midnight), Foote is supposed to have

1 Memoirs of Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough, etc., by Mrs. A. T. Thomson, 1839.

iv.] THE MISCELLANIES. 91

borrowed Mother Cole in The Minor. A third char- acter, Lord Bawble, was considered to reflect upon "a particular person of quality," and the piece was speedily forbidden by the Lord Chamberlain, although it appears to have been acted a few months later without opposition. One of the results of the prohibi- tion, according to Mr. Lawrence, was a Letter to a Noble Lord (the Lord Chamberlain) . . . occasioned by a Representation . . . of a Farce called " Miss Lucy in Town" This, in spite of the Caveat in the Preface to the Miscellanies, he ascribes to Fielding, and styles it "a sharp expostulation ... in which he [Fielding] dis- avowed any idea of a personal attack." But Mr. Lawrence must plainly have been misinformed on the subject, for the pamphlet bears little sign of Fielding's hand. As far as it is intelligible, it is rather against Miss Lucy than for her, and it makes no reference to Lord Bawble's original The name of this injured patrician seems indeed never to have transpired; but he could scarcely have been in any sense an exceptional member of the Georgian aristocracy.

In the same month that Miss Lucy in Town appeared at Drury Lane, Millar published it in book form. In the following June, T. "Waller of the Temple-Cloisters issued the first of a contemplated series of translations from Aristophanes by Henry Fielding, Esq., and the Eev. William Young who sat for Parson Adams. The play chosen was Plutus, the God of Riches, and a notice upon the original cover stated that, according to the reception it met with from the public, it would be followed by the others. It must be presumed that " the distressed, and at present, declining State of

92 FIELDING. [.HAP.

Learning " to which the authors referred in their dedica- tion to Lord Talbot, was not a mere form of speech, for the enterprise does not seem to have met with suffi- cient encouragement to justify its continuance, and this special rendering has long since been supplanted by the more modern versions of Mitchell, Frere, and others. Whether Fielding took any large share in it is not now discernible. It is most likely, however, that the bulk of the work was Young's, and that his colleague did little more than furnish the Preface, which is partly written in the first person, and betrays its origin by a sudden and not very relevant attack upon the " pretty, dapper, brisk, smart, pert Dialogue " of Modern Comedy into which the " infinite Wit " of Wycherley had de- generated under Gibber. It also contains a compliment to the numbers of the " inimitable Author " of the Essay on Man.

This is the second compliment which Fielding had paid to Pope within a brief period, the first having been that in the Champion respecting the translation of the Iliad. What his exact relations with the author of the Dunciad were, has never been divulged. At first they seem to have been rather hostile than friendly. Fielding had ridiculed the Romish Church in the Old Debauchees, a course which Pope could scarcely have approved ; and he was, moreover, the cousin of Lady Mary, now no longer throned in the Twickenham Temple. Pope had commented upon a passage in Tom Thumb, and Fielding had indirectly referred to Pope in the Covent Garden Tragedy. When it had been reported that Pope had gone to see Pasquin, the statement had been at once contradicted. But

iv.] THE MISCELLANIES. 93

Fielding was now, like Pope, against Walpole ; and Joseph Andrews had been published. It may therefore be that the compliments in Plutus and the CJiampion were the result of some rapprochement between the two. It is, nevertheless, curious that, at this very time, an attempt appears to have been made to connect the novelist with the controversy which presently arose out of Gibber's well-known letter to Pope. In August 1742, the month following its publication, among the pamphlets to which it gave rise, was announced The Cudgel ; or, a Crab-tree Lecture. To the Author of the Dun- dad. " By Hercules Vinegar, Esq." This very mediocre satire in verse is still to be found at the British Museum ; but even if it were not included in Fielding's general disclaimer as to unsigned work, it would be difficult to connect it with him. To give but one reason, it would make him the ally and adherent of Gibber, — which is absurd. In all probability, like another Grub Street squib under the same pseudonym, it was by Ealph, who had already attacked Pope, and continued to main- tain the Captain's character in the Champion long after Fielding had ceased to write for it. It is even possible that Ralph had some share in originating the Vinegar family, for it is noticeable that the paper in which they are first introduced bears no initials. In this case he would consider himself free to adopt the name, how- ever disadvantageous that course might be to Fielding's reputation. And it is clear that, whatever their rela- tions had been in the past, they were for the time on opposite sides in politics, since while Fielding had been vindicating the Duchess of Marlborough, Ralph had been writing against her.

94 FIELDING. [CHAP.

These, however, are minor questions, the discussion of which would lead too far from the main narrative of Fielding's life. In the same letter in which Walpole had referred to Miss Lucy in Town, he had spoken of the success of a new player at Goodman's Fields, after whom all the town, in Gray's phrase, was "horn-mad;" but in whose acting Mr. Walpole, with a critical distrust of novelty, saw nothing particularly wonderful This was David Garrick. He had been admitted a student of Lincoln's Inn a year before Fielding entered the Middle Temple, had afterwards turned wine-merchant, and was now delighting London by his versatility in comedy, tragedy, and farce. One of his earliest theat- rical exploits, according to Sir John Hawkins, had been a private representation of Fielding's Mock-Doctor, in a room over the St. John's Gate, Clerkenwell, so long familiar to subscribers of the Gentleman's Magazine ; his fellow-actors being Cave's journeymen printers, and his audience Cave, Johnson, and a few friends. After this he appears to have made the acquaintance of Fielding ; and late in 1742, applied to him to know if he had " any Play by him," as " he was desirous of appear- ing in a new Part." As a matter of fact Fielding had two plays by him — the Good-natured Man (a title subse- quently used by Goldsmith), and a piece called The Wedding Day. The former was almost finished : the latter was an early work, being indeed " the third Dramatic Performance he ever attempted." The necessary ar- rangements having been made with Mr. Fleetwood, the manager of Drury Lane, Fielding set to work to com- plete the Good-natured Man, which he considered the better of the two. When he had done so, he came to

IV.] THE MISCELLANIES. 95

the conclusion that it required more attention than he could give it ; and moreover, that the part allotted to Garrick, although it satisfied the actor, was scarcely important enough. He accordingly reverted to the Wedding Day, the central character of which had been intended for Wilks. It had many faults which none saw more clearly than the author himself, but he hoped that Garrick's energy and prestige would triumphantly surmount all obstacles. He hoped, as well, to improve it by revision. The dangerous illness of his wife, how- ever, made it impossible for him to execute his task; and, as he was pressed for money, the Wedding Day was produced on the 17th of February 1743, apparently much as it had been first written some dozen years before. As might be anticipated, it was not a success. The char- acter of Millamour is one which it is hard to believe that even Garrick could have made attractive, and though others of the parts were entrusted to Mrs. Woffington, Mrs. Pritchard, and Macklin, it was acted but six nights. The author's gains were under £50. In the Preface to the Miscellanies, from which most of the foregoing account is taken, Fielding, as usual, refers its failure to other causes than its inherent defects. Rumours, he says, had been circulated as to its indecency (and in truth some of the scenes are more than hazardous) ; but it had passed the licenser, and must be supposed to have been up to the moral standard of the time. Its unfavour- able reception, as Fielding must have known in his heart, was due to its artistic shortcomings, and also to the fact that a change was taking place in the public taste. It is in connection with the Wedding Day that one of the best-known anecdotes of the author is related.

99 FIELDING. [CHAP.

Garrick had begged him to retrench a certain objection- able passage. This Fielding, either from indolence or unwillingness, declined to do, asserting that if it was not good, the audience might find it out. The passage was promptly hissed, and Garrick returned to the green- room, where the author was solacing himself with a bottle of champagne. " What is the matter, Garrick ?" said he to the flustered actor ; " what are they hissing nowl" He was informed with some heat that they had been hissing the very scene he had been asked to withdraw, "and," added Garrick, "they have so frightened me, that I shall not be able to collect myself again the whole night" — "Oh !" answered the author, with an oath, "they HAVE found it out, have they?" This rejoinder is usually quoted as an instance of Field- ing's contempt for the intelligence of his audience ; but nine men in ten, it may be observed, would have said something of the same sort.

The only other thing which need be referred to in connection with this comedy — the last of his own dramatic works which Fielding ever witnessed upon the stage — is Macklin's doggerel Prologue. Mr. Lawrence attributes this to Fielding ; but he seems to have over- looked the fact that in the Miscellanies it is headed, " Writ and Spoken by Mr. Macklin," which gives it more interest as the work of an outsider than if it had been a mere laugh by the author at himself. Garrick is re- presented as too busy to speak the prologue ; and Field- ing, who has been " drinking to raise his Spirits," has begged Macklin with his "long, dismal, Mercy-begging Face," to go on and apologise. Macklin then pretends to recognise him among the audience, and pokes fun at

iv.] THE MISCELLANIES. 97

his anxieties, telling him that he had better have stuck to "honest Abvam Adams" who, "in spight of Critics, can make his Readers laugh." The words "in spite of critics " indicate another distinction between Fielding's novels and plays, which should have its weight in any comparison of them. The censors of the pit, in the eighteenth century, seem to have exer- cised an unusual influence in deciding whether a play should succeed or not ; l and, from Fielding's frequent references to friends and enemies, it would almost seem as if he believed their suffrages to be more important than a good plot and a witty dialogue. On the other hand, no coterie of Wits and Templars could kill a book like Joseph Andrews. To say nothing of the opportunities afforded by the novel for more leisurely character - drawing, and greater by -play of reflection and description — its reader was an isolated and inde- pendent judge ; and in the long run the difference told wonderfully in favour of the author. Macklin was obviously right in recommending Fielding, even in jest, to stick to Parson Adams, and from the familiar pub- licity of the advice it may also be inferred, not only that the opinion was one commonly current, but that the novel was unusually popular.

The Wedding Day was issued separately in February 1743. It must therefore be assumed that the three volumes of Miscellanies, by Henry Fielding, Esq., in which it was reprinted, and to which reference has so often been made in these pages, did not appear until

1 Miller's Coffee-Souse, 1737, for example, was damned by the Templars because it was supposed to reflect on the keepers of "Dick's." — (Biog. Dramatica.)

H

»8 FIELDING. [CHAP.

later.1 They were published by subscription; and the list, in addition to a large number of aristocratic and legal names, contains some of more permanent interest Side by side with the Chesterfields and Marl- boroughs and Burlingtons and Denbighs, come William Pitt and Henry Fox, Esqs., with Dodington and Win- nington and Hanbury Williams. The theatrical world is well represented by Garrick and Mrs. Woffington and Mrs. Clive. Literature has no names of any eminence except that of Young; for Savage and Whitehead, Mallet and Benjamin Hoadly, are certainly ignes minores. Pope is conspicuous for his absence ; so also are Horace Wai- pole and Gray, while Richardson, of course, is wanting. Johnson, as yet only the author of London, and journey- man to Cave, could scarcely be expected in the roll ; and, in any case, his friendship for the author of Pamela would probably have kept him away. Among some other well-known eighteenth century names are those of Dodsley and Millar the booksellers, and the famous Vauxhall impresario Jonathan Tyers.

The first volume of the Miscellanies, besides a lengthy Preface, includes the author's poems, essays On Con- versation, On the Knowledge of the Characters of Men, On Nothing, a squib upon the transactions of the Royal Society, a translation from Demosthenes, and one or two minor pieces. Much of the biographical material contained in the Preface has already been made use of, as well as those verses which can be definitely dated, or which relate to the author's love - affairs. The hitherto unnoticed portions of the volume consist

1 By advertisement in the London Daily Post and General Adver- tiser, they would seem to have been published early in April 1743.

iv.] THE MISCELLANIES. 99

chiefly of Epistles, in the orthodox eighteenth cen- tury fashion. One — already referred to — is headed Of True Greatness; another, inscribed to the Duke of Richmond, Of Good-nature ; while a third is addressed to a friend On the Choice of a Wife. This last contains some sensible lines, but although Roscoe has managed to extract two quotable passages, it is needless to imitate him here. These productions show no trace of the authentic Fielding. The essays are more remarkable, although, like Montaigne's, they are scarcely described by their titles. That on Conversation is really a little treatise on good breeding; that on the Characters of Men, a lay sermon against Fielding's pet antipathy — hypocrisy. Nothing can well be wiser, even now, than some of the counsels in the former of these papers on such themes as the limits of raillery, the duties of hospitality, and the choice of subject in general conversation. Nor, however threadbare they may look to-day, can the final conclusions be reasonably objected to : — " First, That every Person who indulges his Ill- nature or Vanity, at the Expense of others ; and in intro- ducing Uneasiness, Vexation, and Confusion into Society, however exalted or high-titled he may be, is thoroughly ill-bred ; " and " Secondly, That whoever, from the Goodness of his Disposition or Understanding, endea- vours to his utmost to cultivate the Good-humour and Happiness of others, and to contribute to the Ease and Comfort of all his Acquaintance, however low in Rank Fortune may have placed him, or however clumsy he may be in his Figure or Demeanour, hath, in the truest sense of the Word, a Claim to Good-Breeding." One fancies that this essay must have been a favourite with

100 FIELDING. [CHAP.

the historian of the Book of Snobs and the creator of Major Dobbin.

The Characters of Men is not equal to the Conversation. The theme is a wider one ; and the end proposed, — that of supplying rules for detecting the real disposition through all the social disguises which cloak and envelop it, — can scarcely be said to be attained. But there are happy touches even in this ; and when the author says — " I will venture to affirm, that I have known some of the best sort of Men in the World (to use the vulgar Phrase,) who would not have scrupled cutting a Friend's Throat ; and a Fellow whom no Man should be seen to speak to, capable of the highest Acts of Friendship and Benevolence," one recognises the hand that made the sole good Samaritan in Joseph Andrews "a Lad who hath since been transported for robbing a Hen-roost." The account of the Terres- trial Chrysipus or Guinea, a burlesque on a paper read before the Royal Society on the Fresh Water Polypus, is chiefly interesting from the fact that it is supposed to be written by Petrus Gualterus (Peter Walter), who had an " extraordinary Collection " of them. He died, in fact, worth £300,000. The only other paper in the volume of any value is a short one Of the Remedy of Affliction for the Loss of our Friends, to which we shall presently return.

The farce of Eurydice, and the Wedding Day, which, with A Journey from this World to the Next, etc., make up the contents of the second volume of the Miscellanies, have been already sufficiently discussed. But the Journey deserves some further notice. It has been suggested that this curious Lucianic production may have been prompted by the vision of Mercury and Charon in the

iv.] THE MISCELLANIES. 101

Champion, though the kind of allegory of which it con- sists is common enough with the elder essayists ; and it is notable that another book was published in April 1743, under the title of Cardinal Fleuri/s Journey to the other World, which is manifestly suggested by Quevedo. Fielding's Journey, however, is a fragment which the author feigns to have found in the garret of a stationer in the Strand. Sixteen out of five-and-twenty chapters in Book i. are occupied with the transmigrations of Julian the Apostate, which are not concluded. Then follows another chapter from Book xix., which contains the his- tory of Anna Boleyn, and the whole breaks off abruptly. Its best portion is undoubtedly the first ten chapters, which relate the writer's progress to Elysium, and afford opportunity for many strokes of satire. Such are the whimsical terror of the spiritual traveller in the stage- coach, who hears suddenly that his neighbour has died of smallpox, a disease he had been dreading all his life ; and the punishment of Lord Scrape, the miser, who is doomed to dole out money to all comers, and who, after "being purified in the Body of a Hog," is ultimately to return to earth again. Nor is the delight of some of those who profit by his enforced assistance less keenly realised : — "I remarked a poetical Spirit in particular, who swore he would have a hearty Gripe at him : ' For, says he, the Rascal not only refused to subscribe to my Works ; but sent back my Letter unanswered, tho' I'm a better Gentleman than himself.' " The descriptions of the City of Diseases, the Palace of Death, and the Wheel of Fortune from which men draw their chequered lots, are all unrivalled in their way. But here, as always, it is in his pictures of human nature that Fielding shines,

102 FIELDING. [OHAP

and it is this that makes the chapters in which Minos is shown adjudicating upon the separate claims of the claimants to enter Elysium the most piquant of all. The virtuoso and butterfly hunter, who is repulsed " with great Scorn;" the dramatic author who is admitted (to his disgust), not on account of his works, but because he has once lent " the whole Profits of a Benefit Night to a Friend ;" the parson who is turned back, while his poor parishioners are admitted; and the trembling wretch who has been hanged for a robbery of eighteen-pence, to which he had been driven by poverty, but whom the judge welcomes cordially because he had been a kind father, husband, and son ; all these are conceived in that humane and generous spirit which is Fielding's most engaging characteristic. The chapter immediately following, which describes the literary and other inhabitants of Elysium, is even better. Here is Leonidas, who appears to be only moderately gratified with the honour recently done him by Mr. Glover the poet ; here is Homer, toying with Madam Dacier, and profoundly indifferent as to his birth- place and the continuity of his poems ; here, too, is Shake- speare, who, foreseeing future commentators and the "New Shakespere Society," declines to enlighten Betterton and Booth as to a disputed passage in his works, adding, " I marvel nothing so much as that Men will gird themselves at discovering obscure Beauties in an Author. Certes the greatest and most pregnant Beauties are ever the plainest and most evidently striking; and when two Meanings of a Passage can in the least ballance our Judge- ments which to prefer, I hold it matter of unquestionable Certainty that neither is worth a farthing." Then, again, there are Addison and Steele, who are described with so

nr.] JONATHAN WILD. 108

pleasant a knowledge of their personalities that, although the passage has been often quoted, there seems to be no reason why it should not be quoted once more : —

" Virgil then came up to me, with Mr. Addison under hia Arm. Well, Sir, said he, how many Translations have these few last Years produced of my jflneid ? I told him, I helieved several, but I could not possibly remember ; for I had never read any but Dr. 1'rapp's.1 — Ay, said he, that is a curious Piece indeed ! I then acquainted him with the Discovery made by Mr. Warburton of the Eleusinian Mysteries couched in his 6th book. What Mysteries ? said Mr. Addison. The Eleusinian, answered Virgil, which I have disclosed in my 6th Book. How ! replied Addison. You never mentioned a word of any such Mysteries to me in all our Acquaintance. I thought it was unnecessary, cried the other, to a Man of your infinite Learning : besides, you always told me, you perfectly understood my meaning. Upon this I thought the Critic looked a little out of countenance, and turned aside to a very merry Spirit, one Dick Steele, who embraced him, and told him, He had been the greatest Man upon Earth ; that he readily resigned up all the Merit of his own Works to him. Upon which, Addison gave him a gracious Smile, and clapping him on the Back with much Solemnity, cried out, Well said, Dick"

After encountering these and other notabilities, in- cluding Tom Thumb and Livy, the latter of whom takes occasion to commend the ingenious performances of Lady Marlborough's assistant, Mr. Hooke, the author meets with Julian the Apostate, and from this point the nar- rative grows languid. Its unfinished condition may per- haps be accepted as a proof that Fielding himself had wearied of his scheme.

The third volume of the Miscellanies is wholly occu- pied with the remarkable work entitled the History of the Life of the late Mr. Jonathan Wild the Gh-eat. As in the 1 Dr. Trapp's translation of the sEneid was published in 1718.

104 FIELDING. [CHAP.

case of the Journey from this World to the Next, it is not unlikely that the first germ of this may be found in the pages of the Champion. " Reputation " — says Field- ing in one of the essays m that periodical — "often courts those most who regard her the least Actions have sometimes been attended with Fame, which were undertaken in Defiance of it Jonathan Wyld himself had for many years no small Share of it in this King- dom." The book now under consideration is the elabo- ration of the idea thus casually thrown out Under the name of a notorious thief-taker hanged at Tyburn in 1725, Fielding has traced the Progress of a Rogue to the Gallows, showing by innumerable subtle touches that the (so-called) greatness of a villain does not very materially differ from any other kind of great- ness, which is equally independent of goodness. This continually suggested affinity between the ignoble and the pseudo- noble is the text of the book Against genuine worth (its author is careful to explain) his satire is in no wise directed. He is far from considering "Newgate as no other than Human Nature with its Mask off;" but he thinks "we may be excused for sus- pecting, that the splendid Palaces of the Great are often no other than Newgate with the Mask on." Thus Jona- than Wild the Great is a prolonged satire upon the spuri- ous eminence in which benevolence, honesty, charity, and the like have no part; or, as Fielding prefers to term it, that false or " Bombast greatness " which is so often mistaken for the " true Sublime in Human Nature " — Greatness and Goodness combined. So thoroughly has he explained his intention in the Prefaces to the Miscellanies, and to the book itself, that it is difficult to

IV.]

JONATHAN WILD.

105

comprehend how Scott could fail to see his drift. Pos- sibly, like some others, he found the subject repugnant and painful to his kindly nature. Possibly, too, he did not, for this reason, study the book very carefully, for, with the episode of Heartfree under one's eyes, it is not strictly accurate to say (as he does) that it presents "a picture of complete vice, unrelieved by any thing of human feeling, and never by any accident even deviating into virtue." If the author's introduction be borne in mind, and if the book be read steadily in the light there supplied, no one can refrain from admiring the extraor- dinary skill and concentration with which the plan is pursued, and the adroitness with which, at every turn, the villainy of Wild is approximated to that of those securer and more illustrious criminals with whom he is so seldom confused. And Fielding has never carried one of his chief and characteristic excellences to so great perfection : the book is a model of sustained and sleep- less irony. To make any extracts from it — still less to make any extracts which should do justice to it, is almost impracticable ; but the edifying discourse between Wild and Count La Ruse in Book i., and the pure comedy of that in Book iv. with the Ordinary of Newgate (who ob- jects to wine, but drinks punch because "it is no where spoken against in Scripture " ), as well as the account of the prison faction between Wild and Johnson,1 with its

1 Some critics at this point appear to have identified Johnson and Wild with Lord Wilmington and Sir Robert Walpole (who re- signed in 1742), while Mr. Keightley suspects that Wild through- out typifies Walpole. But the advertisement " from the Publisher " to the edition of 1754 disclaims any such "personal Application." "The Truth is (he says), as a very corrupt State of Morals is here represented, the Scene seems very properly to have been laid in

10« FIELDING. [CHAP.

admirable speech of the " grave Man " against Party, may all be cited as examples of its style and method Nor should the character of Wild in the last chapter, and his famous rules of conduct, be neglected. It must be admitted, however, that the book is not calculated to suit the nicely-sensitive in letters ; or, it may be added, those readers for whom the evolution of a purely intel- lectual conception is either unmeaning or uninteresting. Its place in Fielding's works is immediately after his three great novels, and this is more by reason of its subject than its workmanship, which could hardly be excelled. When it was actually composed is doubtful If it may be connected with the already-quoted passage in the Champion, it must be placed after March 1740, which is the date of the paper ; but, from a reference to Peter Pounce in Book ii., it might also be supposed to have been written after Joseph Andrews. The Bath simile in chapter xiv. Book i., makes it likely that some part of it was penned at that place, where, from an epi- gram in the Miscellanies " written Extempore in the Pump Room," it is clear that Fielding was staying in 1742. But, whenever it was completed, we are inclined to think that it was planned and begun before Joseph Andrews was published, as it is in the highest degree improbable that Fielding, always carefully watching the public taste, would have followed up that fortunate adventure in a new direction by a work so entirely different from it as Jonathan Wild.

Newgate: Nor do I see any Reason for introducing any allegory at all ; unless we will agree that there are, without those Walls, some other Bodies of Men of worse Morals than those within ; and who have, consequently, a Right to change Places with its present Inhabitants." The writer was probably Fielding.

rv.] JONATHAN WILD. 107

A second edition of the Miscellanies appeared in the same year as the first, namely in 1743. From this date until the publication of Tom Jones in 1749, Fielding pro- duced no work of signal importance, and his personal history for the next few years is exceedingly obscure. We are inclined to suspect that this must have been the most trying period of his career. His health was shat- tered, and he had become a martyr to gout, which seri- ously interfered with the active practice of his profession. Again, "about this time," says Murphy vaguely, after speaking of the Wedding Day, he lost his first wife. That she was alive in the winter of 1742-3 is clear, for, in the Preface to the Miscellanies, he describes himself as being then laid up, " with a favourite Child dying in one Bed, and my Wife in a Condition very little better, on another, attended with other Circumstances, which served as very proper Decorations to such a Scene," — by which Mr. Keightley no doubt rightly supposes him to refer to writs and bailiffs. It must also be assumed that Mrs. Fielding was alive when the Preface was written, since, in apologising for an apparent delay in publish- ing the book, he says the "real Eeason" was "the dangerous Illness of one from whom I draw [the italics are ours] all the solid Comfort of my Life." There is another unmistakable reference to her in one of the minor papers in the first volume, viz. that Of the Remedy of Affliction for the Loss of our Friends. " I remember the most excellent of Women, and tenderest of Mothers, when, after a painful and dangerous Delivery, she was told she had a Daughter, answering; Good God! have I pro- duced a Creature who is to undergo what I have suffered/ Some Years afterwards, I heard the same Woman, on the

108 FIELDING. [CHAP.

Death of that very Child, then one of the loveliest Crea- tures ever seen, comforting herself with reflecting, that her Child could never know what it was to fed such a Loss as she then lamented" Were it not for the passages already quoted from the Preface, it might almost be concluded from the tone of the foregoing quotation and the final words of the paper, which refer to our meeting with those we have lost in Heaven, that Mrs. Fielding was already dead. But the use of the word "draw" in the Pre- face affords distinct evidence to the contrary. It is therefore most probable that she died in the latter part of 1743, having been long in a declining state of health. For a time her husband was inconsolable. " The forti- tude of mind," says Murphy, " with which he met all the other calamities of life, deserted him on this most trying occasion." His grief was so vehement " that his friends began to think him in danger of losing his reason."

That Fielding had depicted his first wife in Sophia Western has already been pointed out, and we have the authority of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu and Richardson for saying that she was afterwards repro- duced in Amelia. " Amelia," says the latter, in a letter to Mrs. Donnellan, " even to her noselessness, is again his first wife." Some of her traits, too, are to be detected in the Mrs. Wilson of Joseph Andrews. But, beyond these indications, we hear little about her. Almost all that is definitely known is contained in a passage of the admirable Introductory Anecdotes contributed by Lady Louisa Stuart in 1837 to Lord Wharncliffe's edition of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu's Letters and Works. This account was based upon the recollections of Lady Bute, Lady Mary's daughter.

iv.] JONATHAN WILD. 109

" Only those persons (says Lady Stuart) are mentioned here of whom Lady Bute could speak from her own recollec- tion or her mother's report. Both had made her well in- formed of every particular that concerned her relation Henry Fielding ; nor was she a stranger to that beloved first wife whose picture he drew in his Amelia, where, as she said, even the glowing language he knew how to employ did not do more than justice to the amiable qualities of the original, or to her beauty, although this had suffered a little from the accident related in the novel, — a frightful overturn, which destroyed the gristle of her nose.1 He loved her passionately, and she returned his affection ; yet led no happy life, for they were almost always miserably poor, and seldom in a state of quiet and safety. All the world knows what was his im- prudence ; if ever he possessed a score of pounds, nothing could keep him from lavishing it idly, or make him think of to- morrow. Sometimes they were living in decent lodgings with tolerable comfort ; sometimes in a wretched garret with- out necessaries ; not to speak of the spunging-houses and hiding-places where he was occasionally to be found. His

1 That any one could have remained lovely after such a catastrophe is difficult to believe. But probably Lady Bute (or Lady Stuart) exaggerated its effects ; for — to say nothing of the fact that, throughout the novel, Amelia's beauty is continually commended — in the delightfully feminine description which is given of her by Mrs. James in Book xi. chap, i., pp. 114-15 of the first edition of 1752, although she is literally pulled to pieces, there is no reference whatever to her nose, which may be taken as proof positive that it was not an assailable feature. Moreover, in the book as we now have it, Fielding, obviously in deference to contemporary criticism, inserted the following specific passages: — "She was, indeed, a most charming woman ; and I know not whether the little scar on her nose did not rather add to, than diminish her beauty " (Book iv. chap. vii. ) ; and in Mrs. James's portrait : — "Then her nose, as well proportioned as it is, has a visible scar on one side." No previous biographer seems to have thought it neces- sary to make any mention of these statements, while Johnson's speech about " That vile broken nose, never cured," and Richard- son's coarsely -malignant utterance to Mrs. Donnellan, are every- where industriously remembered and repeated.

110 FIELDING. [CHAP.

elastic gaiety of spirit carried him through it all ; but, mean- while, care and anxiety were preying upon her more delicate mind, and undermining her constitution. She gradually declined, caught a fever, and died in his arms."

As usual, Mr. Keightley has done his best to test this statement to the utmost Part of his examination may be neglected, because it is based upon the misconcep- tion that Lord Wharncliffe, Lady Mary's greatgrand- son, and not Lady Stuart, her granddaughter, was the writer of the foregoing account But as a set-off to the extreme destitution alleged, Mr. Keightley very justly observes that Mrs. Fielding must for some time have had a maid, since it was a maid who had been devotedly attached to her whom Fielding subsequently married. He also argues that " living in a garret and skulking in out o' the way retreats," are incompatible with studying law and practising as a barrister. Mak- ing every allowance, however, for the somewhat exagger- ated way in which those of high rank often speak of the distresses of their less opulent kinsfolk, it is pro- bable that Fielding's married life was one of continual shifts and privations. Such a state of things is com- pletely in accordance with his profuse nature l and his precarious means. Of his family by the first Mrs. Field- ing no very material particulars have been preserved. Writing, in November 1745, in the True Patriot, he speaks of having a son and a daughter, but no son by his first wife seems to have survived him. The late Colonel Chester found the burial of a "James Fielding, son of Henry Fielding," recorded under date of 19th February 1736, in the register of St Giles in

1 The passage as to his imprudence is, oddly enough, omitted from Mr. Keightley 's quotation.

!

iv.] JONATHAN WILD. Ill

the Fields ; but it is by no means certain that this entry refers to the novelist A daughter, Harriet or Harriot, certainly did survive him, for she is mentioned in the Voyage to Lisbon as being of the party who accompanied him. Another daughter, as already stated, probably died in the winter of 1742-3; and the Journey from this World to the Next contains the touching reference to this or another child, of which Dickens writes so warmly in one of his letters. "I presently," says Fielding, speaking of his entrance into Elysium, " met a little Daughter, whom I had lost several Years before. Good Gods ! what Words can describe the Raptures, the melting passionate Ten- derness, with which we kiss'd each other, continuing in our Embrace, with the most extatic Joy, a Space, which if Time had been measured here as on Earth, could not have been less than half a Year."

From the death of Mrs. Fielding until the publication of the True Patriot in 1745 another comparative blank ensues in Fielding's history ; and it can only be filled by the assumption that he was still endeavouring to follow his profession as a barrister. His literary work seems to have been confined to a Preface to the second edition of his sister's novel of David Simple, which ap- peared in 1 744. This, while rendering fraternal justice to that now forgotten book, is memorable for some personal utterances on Fielding's part. In denying the author- ship of David Simple, which had been attributed to him, he takes occasion to appeal against the injustice of refer- ring anonymous works to his pen, in the face of his distinct engagement in the Preface to the Miscellanies, that he would thenceforth write nothing except over his own signature ; and he complains that such a course has a

112 FIELDING. [CHAP.

tendency to injure him in a profession to which " he has applied with so arduous and intent a diligence, that he has had no leisure, if he had inclination, to compose anything of this kind (i.e. David Simple)." At the same time, he formally withdraws his promise, since it has in no wise exempted him from the scandal of putting forth anonymous work. From other passages in this "Pre- face," it may be gathered the immediate cause of irrita- tion was the assignment to his pen of " that infamous paultry libel" the Causidicade, a satire directed at the law in general, and some of the subscribers to the Mis- cellanies in particular. "This," he says, "accused me not only of being a bad writer, and a bad man, but with downright idiotism, in flying in the face of the greatest men of my profession." It may easily be con- ceived that such a report must be unfavourable to a struggling barrister, and Fielding's anxiety on this head is a strong proof that he was still hoping to succeed at the Bar. To a subsequent collection of Familiar Letters between the Principal Characters in David Simple and some others, he supplied another preface three years later, to- gether with five little-known epistles which, nevertheless, are not without evidence of his characteristic touch.

A life of ups and downs like Fielding's is seldom remarkable for its consistency. It is therefore not surprising to find that, despite his desire in 1744 to refrain from writing, he was again writing in 1745. The landing of Charles Fxiward attracted him once more into the ranks of journalism, on the side of the Government, and gave rise to the True Patriot, a weekly paper, the first number of which appeared in November. This, having come to an end with the

iv.] JONATHAN WILD. 113

Rebellion, was succeeded in December 1747 by the Jacobite's Journal, supposed to emanate from " John Trott-Plaid, Esq.," and intended to push the discomfit- ure of Jacobite sentiment still further. It is needless to discuss these mainly political efforts at any length. They are said to have been highly approved by those in power : it is certain that they earned for their author the stigma of "pension'd scribbler." Both are now very rare; and in Murphy the former is represented by twenty-four numbers, the latter by two only. The True Patriot contains a dream of London abandoned to the rebels, which is admirably graphic ; and there is also a prophetic chronicle of events for 1746, in which the same idea is treated in a lighter and more satirical vein. But perhaps the most interesting feature is the reappear- ance of Parson Adams, who addresses a couple of letters to the same periodical — one on the rising gener- ally, and the other on the "young England" of the day, as exemplified in a very offensive specimen he had recently encountered at Mr. Wilson's. Other minor points of interest in connection with the Jacobite's Journal, are the tradition associating Hogarth with the rude woodcut headpiece (a Scotch man and woman on an ass led by a monk) which surmounted its earlier numbers, and the genial welcome given in No. 5, perhaps not without some touch of contrition, to the two first volumes, then just published, of Richardson's Clarissa. The pen is the pen of an imaginary " corre- spondent," but the words are unmistakably Fielding's : —

" When I tell you I have lately received this Pleasure [t.e. of reading a new master-piece], you will not want me to inform you that I owe it to the Author of CLARISSA. Such

I

114 FIELDING. [CHAP.

Simplicity, such Manners, such deep Penetration into Nature ; such Power to raise and alarm the Passions, few Writers, either ancient or modern, have been possessed of. My Affec- tions are so strongly engaged, and my Fears are so raised, by what I have already read, that I cannot express my Eagerness to see the rest Sure this Mr. Richardson is Master of all that Art which Horace compares to Witchcraft — Pectus inaniter angit,

Irritat, mulcet, falsis terroribus implet

Ut Magus.—"

Between the discontinuance of the True Patriot and the establishment of its successor occurred an event, the precise date of which has been hitherto unknown, namely, Fielding's second marriage. The account given of this by Lady Louisa Stuart is as follows : —

" His [Fielding's] biographers seem to have been shy of disclosing that after the death of this charming woman [his first wife] he married her maid. And yet the act was not so discreditable to his character as it may sound. The maid had few personal charms, but was an excellent creature, de- votedly attached to her mistress, and almost broken-hearted for her loss. In the first agonies of his own grief, which ap- proached to frenzy, he found no relief but from weeping along with her ; nor solace, when a degree calmer, but in talking to her of the angel they mutually regretted. This made her his habitual confidential associate, and in process of time he began to think he could not give his children a tenderer mother, or secure for himself a more faithful housekeeper and nurse. At least this was what he told his friends ; and it is certain that her conduct as his wife confirmed it, and fully justified his good opinion."

It has now been ascertained that the marriage took place at St Bene't's, Paul's Wharf, an obscure little church in the City, at present surrendered to a Welsh congrega- tion, but at that time, like Mary-le-bone old church, much

iv.] JONATHAN WILD. 115

in request for unions of a private character. The date in the register is the 27th of November 1747. The second Mrs. Fielding's maiden name, which has been hitherto variously reported as Macdonnell, Macdonald, and Macdaniel,is given as Mary Daniel,1 and she is further described as "of St. Clement's Danes, Middlesex, Spin- ster." Either previously to this occurrence, or immedi- ately after it, Fielding seems to have taken two rooms in a house in Back Lane, Twickenham, " not far," says the Rev. Mr. Cobbett in his Memorials, "from the site of Copt Hall." In 1872 this house was still standing, — a quaint old-fashioned wooden structure;2 — and from hence, on the 25th February 1748, was baptized the first of the novelist's sons concerning whom any definite informa- tion exists — the William Fielding who, like his father, became a Westminster magistrate. Beyond suggesting that it may supply a reason why, during Mrs. Fielding's life-time, her husband's earliest biographer made no refer- ence to the marriage, it is needless to dwell upon the proximity between the foregoing dates. In other respects the circumstance now first made public is not inconsistent with Lady Stuart's narrative ; and there is no doubt, from the references to her in the Journal of a Voyage to Lisbon and elsewhere, that Mary Daniel did prove an excellent wife, mother, and nurse. Another thing is made clear by the date established, and this is that the verses " On Felix ; Marry'd to a Cook-Maid " in the Gentleman's Magazine for July 1746, to which Mr. Lawrence refers, cannot possibly have anything to do with Fielding,

1 See note to Fielding's letter in Chap. vii.

2 Now (1883) it no longer exists, and a row of cottages occupies the site.

Il« FIELDING. [CHAP. IT.

although they seem to indicate that alliances of the kind were not unusual Perhaps Pamela had made them fashionable. On the other hand, the supposed allusion to Lyttelton and Fielding, to be found in the first edition of Peregrine Pickle, but afterwards suppressed, receives a certain confirmation. " When," says Smollett, speaking of the relations of an imaginary Mr. Spondy with Gosling Scrag, who is understood to represent Lyttelton, " he is inclined to marry his own cook-wench, his gracious patron may condescend to give the bride away ; and may finally settle him in his old age, as a trading Westminster justice." That, looking to the facts, Fielding's second marriage should have gained the approval and counte- nance of Lyttelton is no more than the upright and honourable character of the latter would lead us to expect

The Jacobite's Journal ceased to appear in November 1748. In the early part of the December following, the remainder of Smollett's programme came to pass, and by Lyttelton's interest Fielding was appointed a Justice of the Peace for Westminster. From a letter in the Bedford Correspondence, dated 13th December 1748, respecting the lease of a house or houses which would qualify him to act for Middlesex, it would seem that the county was afterwards added to his commission. He must have entered upon his office in the first weeks of December, as upon the ninth of that month one John Salter was committed to the Gatehouse by Henry Fielding, Esq.,